Pouya/adr-sml
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: build step 2 — the home page; close Q35, Q37, Q39; Q39's answer corrected the register

Browse Source 
Pouya's rulings and the page are one commit, not two, because they are not
separable: Q37 changed the credential label the page renders, Q39 scoped the
arbitration copy, and Q35 gave Med-Arb the row that lets the footer link stand.
Splitting them would produce a commit where the register says one thing and the
page says another.

RULINGS

Q39 — ANSWERED, and my assertion was FALSE as a universal. Pouya checked
rather than defended. Family arbitration in Ontario is gated: prescribed
training, 14h on screening for domestic violence and power imbalances, 30h of
Ontario family law for arbitrators outside the bar, 10h ongoing per two years.
claims-auditor produced that counter-example from inside the repo on 2026-08-26
and it was right. The source is now IN the repo per R14 —
docs/reference/ontario-family-arbitration-training.md, retrieved with its
provenance — and §4 states which half it establishes: the family gate directly,
the commercial half only by absence. So "commercial arbitration in Ontario
requires no licence and no designation" is recorded as Pouya's stated position,
unstamped. What disposes of the question is the scope exclusion: he does not do
family arbitration, so it is NOT OFFERED and the gate never bears on the
practice.

The false universal survived in three more live places, found by grep, not
recall: §4's NOT-NEGOTIABLE boundary bullet (the boundary paragraph breaching
its own boundary), §9's Q33 closure row, and a comment in SiteHeader.astro.

Q35 — ANSWERED, all four items, and the answer supplied a gate that was
missing. Med-Arb gets an Offerings row and stays in the footer sitemap. The six
subject-matter labels pass test 1. §4 gains "Subject-matter areas — the
publication gate": competence to accept an appointment, AND a page that frames
it as positioning without claiming history. Nothing in the nav or footer is
unrowed any more.

Q37 — ANSWERED. "Law and engineering" becomes "Legal training and engineering
practice". A degree is not a practice; the parallel was doing the implying.

Q38/R13 — the committed SVG does not close it; the walk-back went too far. It
renders faithfully BECAUSE it is the raster. R13 stays open.

R1 — surfaced and acknowledged; the interim licensure framing is now carried by
a shipped page rather than a spec, which raises the stakes.

BUILD STEP 2

Seven of docs/01's eight home sections, six new components, zero JavaScript.
Section 7 (Latest insights) ships at step 7 with the collection it lists —
recorded in docs/01 and in the page, not just here. Four credential slots, not
three: §4's paired-disclosure condition requires the Q.Arb stage on any page
that offers arbitration. No booking link (R6). The masthead tagline is
suppressed on / (it duplicated the hero eyebrow). The step-1 proof sheet is
deleted, and five live references to it were found by grep.

WHAT THE REVIEWS FOUND — 24 findings across the two passes

claims-auditor FAILED it on ten, every one implication or scope rather than
fabrication, which is where D13 says the risk lives. The four that mattered:
"I mediate and arbitrate" asserted a track record §4 does not hold for
arbitration; the JSON-LD asserted arbitration twice and stated the stage
nowhere (a crawler-only claim is still a claim); "at one published rate with
preparation time included" misdescribed money against docs/07's two day rates
and capped prep allowance; and "Law and engineering are not blended here" was
Q37's struck parallel relocated into prose one day after Pouya struck it.
It also found the Canadian Tax Foundation missing from §9 Q8 — a stale second
copy of a fact that would have bitten at step 3.

adversarial-reviewer found fourteen, three blocking. The first was
class="section-head" on <SectionHeading> never matching — the parent-cannot-
style-a-child defect for the FOURTH time, written into a diff where I had just
added fresh warnings about it to two other components. Measured: 0px margin,
0px gap, headings over the card edges, with astro check and eslint both clean.
I had looked at a screenshot of that section and passed over it. Fixed with a
page-owned wrapper (48px, measured) and the prop is deleted from six components
so it is now a build error. Also: the credential row was never "two up on a
phone" and its comment said it was; PROCESS was hardcoded in the page against
the reason written in site.ts; 83px of residual overflow at a 200% default font
size, now 3px.

Seven more I found myself first, including <Picture widths> declaring the
untouched 1600px master as the <img src> fallback (254,626 B for a 476px slot,
and the build log said "before: 349kB" either way), and a prop named `as`
silently turning off type-checking for a whole component.

VERIFICATION — run, not asserted. Full figures in AGENTS.md entry (w).

npx tsc 6.0.3 · check 0/0/0 · lint clean · build clean · audit 0
1 <script> and it is JSON-LD; non-JSON-LD scripts 0; no JS bundle; identical
page with script execution disabled (444 nodes, 6,578 chars)
Phase 5 minifier check: no `animation` shorthand beside animation-timeline
overflow 0 at 14 widths, AND every mark measured at 1.5654-1.5657 vs 1.5657
one h1, no heading skips, focus order == DOM order across 44 focusables
31 painted contrast pairs at 3 widths, 0 failures
72/72 hit-test points across 8 cards resolve to the card's link
print 0 hidden, reduced-motion 0 hidden
Lighthouse NOT RUN — tool unavailable until step 7 (R11)
HTML validator NOT RUN, and 4 of 12 srcsets carry a duplicate 1x descriptor

Opened for Pouya: Q40 (one OG image for nineteen pages), Q41 (does Q37 reach
prose; may the comparative be restored; what LAT pre-hearing mediation means),
Q42 (the four "also offered" processes have no row), Q43 (the process timings
are published commitments with no row).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e
This commit is contained in:
Pouya Lajevardi
2026-08-27 16:31:56 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 8a2f513577
commit 165d259f5c
26 changed files with 2636 additions and 742 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
src/data/site.ts
+163 -13
View File
@@ -118,22 +118,48 @@ export const ROLE = {
export const CREDENTIAL_ROW = [
{ value: 'Q.Med', label: 'ADRIC / ADRIO designation' },
/**
* TODO(pouya): AGENTS.md Q37 — is "Law and engineering" the right label?
* Q37 CLOSED 2026-08-27. This label read 'Law and engineering' and it is now
* 'Legal training and engineering practice'. Pouya's reasoning, kept because
* it is the finding rather than the fix:
*
* §4's substitution principle supplies the three VALUES (`Q.Med / JD + ML /
* EN · FA`); the labels come from docs/03 and are not themselves registered.
* `claims-auditor` reads this one as a D13 implication risk: "engineering" is
* shorthand for a verified *practising* claim, so the parallel invites "Law"
* to be read the same way — and D13 bars implication as hard as assertion.
* "The parallel was doing the implying — a degree and a practice under one
* noun. The asymmetry is the honest part."
*
* Left as written, because it is docs/03's approved copy and changing
* approved copy is not an implementer's call. Nothing renders it yet. Answer
* before step 2 builds the credential row.
* A JD is a degree. Engineering is a practice, and a verified one (§4).
* Setting the two in parallel invited the reader to supply the symmetry, and
* for 'Law' the missing half is a licence — which D13 bars by implication as
* hard as by assertion.
*
* IT IS DELIBERATELY LOPSIDED AND LONGER. Do not tidy it back into a
* parallel, and do not shorten it to fit a layout; change the layout.
*/
{ value: 'JD + ML', label: 'Law and engineering' },
{ value: 'JD + ML', label: 'Legal training and engineering practice' },
{ value: 'EN · FA', label: 'Bilingual practice' },
] as const;
/**
* The FOURTH credential slot — separate on purpose, so a three-slot layout
* cannot be handed four by accident and a page has to opt in.
*
* docs/03: 'Fourth slot where the layout has one: Q.Arb — commenced August
* 2026. Use that wording, not "in progress"' — the weaker form drifts toward
* 'nearly complete', which §4 Forbidden bars outright.
*
* REQUIRED on any page that offers arbitration, not decorative. §4 Offerings
* carries a paired-disclosure condition: the site may make the offering only
* while 'stating the second plainly', and 'neither half may be dropped'. The
* footer's designation strip satisfies it site-wide; a page whose opening
* sentence says 'arbitrator' should not make the reader scroll to the footer
* for the stage.
*
* The em-dash in docs/03's string is carried by the layout (value over label),
* not by the text. Same wording, same pairing.
*/
export const CREDENTIAL_ROW_ARB = {
value: 'Q.Arb',
label: 'Commenced August 2026',
} as const; // [verified 2026-08-26 — Pouya]
/** Analytics: privacy-first and cookieless (D15). No GA4, no consent banner. */
export const ANALYTICS = {
/**
@@ -241,29 +267,98 @@ export const PRACTICE_SLUGS = [
export type PracticeSlug = (typeof PRACTICE_SLUGS)[number];
/**
* The six areas, with the one-line blurb each card renders.
*
* THE BLURBS LIVE HERE, not in the pages, because `/` and `/practice/` both
* render them and two copies of a claim-bearing sentence is one copy that will
* eventually be wrong. Same reasoning as ROLE and CREDENTIAL_ROW above.
*
* EVERY BLURB IS DISPUTE TYPES, NOT HISTORY. docs/03: "Frame as positioning,
* not as history" — 'Built to facilitate ... on Ontario's megaproject pipeline',
* never 'extensive experience resolving'. AGENTS.md §4 (Q35, 2026-08-27) makes
* that condition 2 of the publication gate for naming a practice area at all.
* A blurb that claims volume fails the gate even though the label passes.
*
* Nothing here may carry a count, a value, a settlement rate, or a superlative
* (§4 Forbidden). Dispute types are not claims of caseload.
*/
export const PRACTICE_AREAS = [
{
slug: 'construction',
name: 'Construction & Infrastructure',
chip: 'Construction',
blurb:
'Liens, delay and change-order claims, scheduling, subcontract and ' +
"deficiency disputes. Built for Ontario's megaproject pipeline.",
},
{
slug: 'technology',
name: 'Technology, AI & Data',
chip: 'Technology',
blurb:
'Software contracts, SLA and MSA breakdowns, data residency and ' +
'processing, AI vendor diligence, IP and licensing.',
},
{
slug: 'energy',
name: 'Energy, Grid & Regulatory',
chip: 'Energy',
blurb:
'Grid connection and allocation, leave-to-construct, ' +
'proponent–municipality disputes, IESO market participation.',
},
{
slug: 'insurance',
name: 'Insurance, SABS & LAT',
chip: 'Insurance',
/**
* "LAT pre-hearing mediation" was flagged by `claims-auditor` 2026-08-27:
* `docs/01` §`/practice/insurance/` lists that phrase as a SEARCH INTENT,
* not as an offering, and as a service blurb it reads as conducting
* mediation inside the LAT's own statutory process — which is not what a
* privately retained neutral is appointed to do.
*
* Reworded to the offering that is actually rowed in §4 (mediation) applied
* to the subject matter that is actually verified (insurance / SABS).
* Q41 asks Pouya to confirm the intent before the page ships at step 5.
*/
blurb:
'Accident benefits and SABS entitlement, MIG disputes, and private ' +
'mediation of matters before the LAT.',
},
{ slug: 'technology', name: 'Technology, AI & Data', chip: 'Technology' },
{ slug: 'energy', name: 'Energy, Grid & Regulatory', chip: 'Energy' },
{ slug: 'insurance', name: 'Insurance, SABS & LAT', chip: 'Insurance' },
{
slug: 'shareholder',
name: 'Shareholder & Family Business',
chip: 'Shareholder',
/**
* "Family Business" means COMMERCIAL disputes among family shareholders.
* The blurb says "family-held companies" and names commercial dispute types
* for that reason — AGENTS.md Q39, 2026-08-27.
*
* The explicit exclusion — family law matters are not accepted — belongs on
* the PAGE, one sentence, at build step 5 (docs/01 §/practice/shareholder/).
* Pouya scoped it there. Do not add it to this blurb: on a six-card grid it
* unbalances the row and reads defensively, and the wording here already
* makes the area unambiguously commercial.
*/
blurb:
'Shareholder and partnership disputes, co-founder breakdowns, and ' +
'business succession in family-held companies.',
},
{
slug: 'cross-cultural',
name: 'Cross-Border & Diaspora',
chip: 'Cross-cultural',
blurb:
'Diaspora business succession, dual-jurisdiction shareholder disputes, ' +
'and cross-cultural commercial matters. Conducted in English or Farsi.',
},
] as const satisfies ReadonlyArray<{
slug: PracticeSlug;
name: string;
chip: string;
blurb: string;
}>;
/**
@@ -285,6 +380,61 @@ type _SlugsWithoutAnArea = Exclude<
>;
export type _SlugCoverage = _AssertNever<_SlugsWithoutAnArea>;
/**
* The five process steps. **HERE, NOT IN THE PAGE**, for the reason written
* against PRACTICE_AREAS above and applied by `adversarial-reviewer` 2026-08-27:
* `/` renders a compressed strip of these and `/process/` renders them in full
* at build step 6, so a copy typed into one page is a copy that will eventually
* disagree with the other. The proof is already in the history — the step-3 body
* below carried a fee claim that the same session's claims audit found to be
* wrong against `docs/07`, and it existed in exactly one place. After step 6 it
* would have existed in two.
*
* TIMINGS ARE `docs/01` §`/process/`'s, verbatim: "confidential intake (day 0) ·
* engagement and framing (1–7) · pre-session exchange (7–21) · the session
* (21–30) · binding conclusion (30+)". `docs/03` §Process requires them REAL
* rather than illustrative, so they are not softened to "typically" — and they
* are not invented either. **They have no §4 row; that is Q43.**
*
* Step 5 is labelled from the spec but its body says what actually concludes —
* minutes of settlement in a mediation, an award where the process is arbitral.
* "Binding conclusion" alone would read as though a mediation binds, which it
* does not until the parties sign.
*
* NO FEE CLAIM IN ANY BODY. `docs/07` bundles a CAPPED preparation allowance
* (2 h in the half day, 3 h in the full day) and says in terms that it "must be
* stated on the page... Do not quietly fold it into the hours figure." A
* five-word strip cannot state it properly, and stating it improperly
* misdescribes money. `/fees/` at step 9.
*/
export const PROCESS = [
{
title: 'Confidential intake',
timing: 'Day 0',
body: 'A scheduled call to scope the matter, identify the parties, and run conflicts.',
},
{
title: 'Engagement and framing',
timing: 'Days 1–7',
body: 'Terms of appointment, the issues in dispute, and who attends.',
},
{
title: 'Pre-session exchange',
timing: 'Days 7–21',
body: 'Briefs and documents, exchanged in advance so the session starts informed.',
},
{
title: 'The session',
timing: 'Days 21–30',
body: 'Half day or full day, in person or by video.',
},
{
title: 'Conclusion',
timing: 'Day 30 onward',
body: 'Minutes of settlement — or an award, where the process is arbitral.',
},
] as const;
/** Seven items is the ceiling before a nav stops being scannable. */
export const PRIMARY_NAV = [
{ href: '/about/', label: 'About' },