feat: build steps 7a-10 — the site is complete and reviewable at 22 pages
Steps 7a through 10 as one authorised run. Nothing deployed (D11).
7a Lighthouse returns as `lighthouse@13.4.1` + `chrome-launcher`, NOT
`@lhci/cli`. AGENTS.md §7's advisory attribution was wrong: the carriers
were @lhci/cli's own `tmp` and @puppeteer/browsers' `extract-zip`, not
Lighthouse, which audits clean. A deliberate deviation from R11's literal
trigger, recorded with what it costs. Local gate; CI has no Chrome.
7b OG card generator (satori + sharp) discharges R15 — 20 typed cards plus
per-article cards; the portrait stays on / and /about/ by Q40. Insights
plumbing: ArticleCard, Prose, the index, the article route, articleGraph,
and /'s section 7. Card copy is constrained structurally because text in a
JPEG cannot be grepped by check:claims: every headline IS its page's <h1>,
enforced by `npm run og:proof`.
7c Five drafted launch articles, draft: true / reviewedByPouya: false. An
independent compliance audit returned 76 findings and 57 unsourced
assertions; all blocking and should-fix applied.
8 /contact/, the intake form, and backend/intake/ (undeployed). Plain HTML
POST to a same-origin /api/intake with a 303 redirect, so the form works
with zero JavaScript. docs/05 records three deliberate deviations.
9 /fees/ on Q59's ruling — overtime runs from the session cap, and the
reservation point ships adjacent to the rate. One-page PDF bio discharges
R16; /bio/ is its source, so the circulated artefact stays inside the
review apparatus.
10 /legal/privacy/ and /legal/terms/, written to the backend as built. Three
of the policy's statements are derived and cannot drift.
Also: /about/'s inverse credentials band (approved at step 6); Q59 closed;
R15 and R16 discharged; and a fix to shipped copy — /practice/energy/ asserted
the absence of a regulation the source extract says must not be asserted.
Review: adversarial-reviewer, two rounds (D20/D19). Round 1 returned 16
findings including two blocking — an invisible ghost button on /fees/ at
1.00:1 that Lighthouse scored 100, and a privacy policy that named one data
processor when there are two. All 16 acted on.
Lighthouse, 22 pages, mobile: performance 99-100, accessibility 100,
best practices 100, SEO 100 on every indexable page, CLS 0.000.
AGENTS.md entry (ah) has the detail, including four of my own verification
commands that were wrong and what each of them nearly caused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
6cfe69033f
commit
210bc25a26
+27
-2
@@ -32,12 +32,37 @@ export default defineConfig({
|
||||
integrations: [
|
||||
mdx(),
|
||||
sitemap({
|
||||
// /legal/* is noindex by spec (docs/04) and nothing else is excluded.
|
||||
// NOINDEX PAGES ARE EXCLUDED, and the list is now three shapes rather
|
||||
// than one. `/legal/*` is noindex by spec (docs/04). The two added at
|
||||
// build step 8 are the intake form's POST-redirect-GET landing pages:
|
||||
// both are transactional, neither has standalone value, and a search
|
||||
// result reading "your inquiry has been received" for someone who has not
|
||||
// sent one is worse than no result at all.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ⚠️ `/insights/` IS DELIBERATELY NOT HERE even though it emits
|
||||
// `noindex` while no article is published. This filter cannot see
|
||||
// collection data — it runs from build config, with no access to
|
||||
// `getCollection` — so the exclusion could only be a guess at the
|
||||
// collection's state, and it would then be wrong in the direction that
|
||||
// matters the moment an article publishes. The page derives its own
|
||||
// `noindex` from the collection on every build, so the mismatch is
|
||||
// temporary, self-clearing, and reported accurately by Search Console as
|
||||
// excluded-by-noindex. Recorded rather than fixed with a frontmatter
|
||||
// parser in build config.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The `/type-scale/` half of this condition is gone with the page it
|
||||
// named: the step-1 proof sheet was deleted at step 2, as its own comment
|
||||
// and InfinityMark's both said it would be. Recoverable from git if the
|
||||
// specimen is ever wanted again; it is not a route the site ships.
|
||||
filter: (page) => !page.includes('/legal/'),
|
||||
filter: (page) =>
|
||||
!page.includes('/legal/') &&
|
||||
!page.includes('/contact/received/') &&
|
||||
!page.includes('/contact/could-not-send/') &&
|
||||
// `/bio/` is a condensed duplicate of `/about/` and `/fees/`, and it
|
||||
// exists to be rendered to a PDF (R16). Two URLs competing on the same
|
||||
// content is the thing `docs/04` is most concerned with, so it is
|
||||
// `noindex` and out of the sitemap.
|
||||
!page.includes('/bio/'),
|
||||
changefreq: 'monthly',
|
||||
// No `lastmod`. It was `new Date()`, which stamped every URL with the
|
||||
// build time — telling crawlers all 17 pages changed whenever one did.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user