feat: rule Q58 and close Q57; §4 lists all six areas; docs/03's checklist cites §4 instead of restating it
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Four rulings from Pouya, plus what implementing them turned up. Q58 — RULED, and he attributed the ambiguity to his own document: "3.5 was meant as the TOTAL time committed, of which 2 is preparation — leaving 1.5 hours in the room. Your arithmetic caught it: if prep sat inside, 3.5 and 7 wouldn't be exactly 2x, because preparation doesn't scale with session length." The card now reads: half day up to 3 hours of session, fee includes up to 2 hours of preparation, $2,000; full day up to 6 hours, up to 3 hours of preparation, $4,000. docs/07's own research table corroborates 3 and 6 — Patey and Zuber both publish those hours, and ADR Chambers' roster rate counts preparation separately from "up to three hours of mediation". One provenance note under R14: he recalled "all or part of 3 hours" as their wording; the committed extract carries the hours but not the phrase, so docs/07 cites the hours and attributes the phrase to nobody. Two things fell out of the ruling that the instruction did not name, and both were defects. docs/07 §All parameters confirmed was itself prescribing the flat "including 2 hours of preparation" — the sentence /for-parties/ was built against, so the spec was generating the defect. And the cap had to reach the copy: "including up to 2 hours". FEES.mediation.*.hours is corrected 3.5 -> 3 and 7 -> 6; it had no consumer in src/ while the question was open, which is the only reason no page was ever wrong. /fees/ is unblocked for step 9 on the question Q58 asked. Q57 — CLOSED with no seventh undertaking. "A reader assumes the outcome, and the obvious undertaking adds nothing a reader doesn't already infer." The TODO(pouya) is replaced by the ruling where the question was; src/ now carries zero live TODO(pouya) markers. §4's mediation row lists all six published areas. Q56's ruling had named five, which was four areas plus the word "commercial" — a scope descriptor, not a seventh area. The hedge is struck on his instruction; the clause saying the six are not the authorised subject-matter list is restored, because his ruling supplied a correct value and did not close Q35(c)'s class. Split-stamped. docs/03's compliance checklist now names what to look for on a page and which §4 row decides it, never the bar's own wording. 12 items before, 12 after — a structural fix, not a coverage change. Thirteen review findings across two rounds, all applied, none declined. Three were mine to own. The capped-form rule was written and then applied to one surface: /mediation/ shipped an uncapped form in words no barred-string grep could reach, site.ts quoted a docs/07 sentence Q58 had just deleted, and §9's Q15/Q16/Q17 row prescribed the flat form — which is what a later implementer building /fees/ reads. A derived fee term was asserted as applied fact in the document that is the authority on money: "overtime begins after 3 h and 6 h" is in no ruling. Struck, and opened as Q59. And round 2 caught the arithmetic in round 1's own fix. The full-day route is flat $4,000 until hour 6, so generalising it as 500n+1000 for all n>=3 was valid only from 6 h, and "cheaper by $500 at every length" was wrong across the whole 3-6 h band. The real spread is $2,000 at three hours narrowing to $500 from six on — up to four times larger, and largest exactly where a half-day booking overruns. Written into docs/07 §Recorded dissent and §12's R5 row, which is where the 12-month fee review will read it. Round 1's fix for the missing consequence also published the overtime rate on a page that now states an unambiguous cap, defining the trigger by adjacency with no other quantity for it to attach to; the rate came off the page. R11 at the step 6 -> 7 boundary: 13 of 14 pins current. §7's TypeScript hold named one gate and there are two — typescript-eslint requires <6.1.0, tighter than @astrojs/check, so the recorded removal trigger was unreachable. Both are now named. Verified: check 0 errors, lint 0, build 0 (14 pages), check:claims 0, npm audit 0, minifier tripwire clean, zero JS shipped, all copy present with JavaScript disabled. Lighthouse not run — tool unavailable until step 7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
13b97841b9
commit
6cfe69033f
+17
-20
@@ -28,25 +28,22 @@
|
||||
* page genuinely is Q&A" — so a question cannot reach the structured data
|
||||
* without appearing on the page, and the two cannot drift.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ⚠️ THE FEE FIGURES ARE INTERPOLATED FROM `FEES`, NOT TYPED. D14's card is one
|
||||
* source; a second hand-typed copy on the page a party reads is the copy that
|
||||
* goes stale, and it goes stale silently.
|
||||
* ⚠️ EVERY FEE FIGURE AND EVERY DURATION IS INTERPOLATED FROM `FEES`, NEVER
|
||||
* TYPED — a second hand-typed copy on the page a party reads is the one that
|
||||
* goes stale, silently. The two allowances are different things: `hours` is the
|
||||
* session, `prepIncluded` is preparation, and `docs/07` requires each published
|
||||
* as a cap with its own noun. **The unit here is "hours of mediation", not
|
||||
* "of session"** — `docs/01` bars jargon on this page and this page defines its
|
||||
* other term of art; the plainer noun is ADR Chambers' own, quoted in `docs/07`.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ⚠️ AND THE BUNDLED PREPARATION IS STATED IN HOURS, NEVER AS "PREPARATION
|
||||
* INCLUDED". `docs/07` §All parameters confirmed is explicit: *"Preparation time
|
||||
* is bundled and MUST be stated on the page — 'including 2 hours of
|
||||
* preparation'… Do not quietly fold it into the hours figure."* The allowance is
|
||||
* CAPPED, so the unqualified form sells an uncapped one. This page shipped
|
||||
* "with preparation included" for one pass; `adversarial-reviewer` found it, and
|
||||
* `prepIncluded` had been declared in `site.ts` with no consumer anywhere.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* ⚠️ AND THIS PAGE DOES NOT STATE HOW LONG A MEDIATION DAY IS — see §9 Q58.
|
||||
* `docs/07`'s card reads *"Half day — up to 3.5 h, INCLUDING 2 h preparation"*,
|
||||
* which makes 3.5 the billed envelope and the room time 1.5 h. `FEES.mediation
|
||||
* .halfDay.hours` documents neither reading. A draft answered "what happens on
|
||||
* the day" with "about 3.5 hours", which is the envelope presented as the day,
|
||||
* to the reader least able to check it. Do not restore a duration here until
|
||||
* Q58 is answered.
|
||||
* ⚠️ AND NO OVERTIME FIGURE ON THIS PAGE UNTIL §9 Q59 IS ANSWERED. The rate is
|
||||
* publishable (D14, `docs/07` — **not** §4, which has no row reaching the rate
|
||||
* card). **The point at which overtime STARTS is not settled**, and $500 an hour
|
||||
* printed two answers below an unambiguous "up to 3 hours" defines it by
|
||||
* adjacency: there is no other quantity on the page for it to attach to. Under
|
||||
* the envelope reading a fourth hour carries nothing, so the inference
|
||||
* over-states a party's own exposure — and it also travels alone into the
|
||||
* `FAQPage` node. So the charge is named without its rate or its trigger.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
import BaseLayout from '../layouts/BaseLayout.astro';
|
||||
import Button from '../components/Button.astro';
|
||||
@@ -88,7 +85,7 @@ const FAQ = [
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
q: 'What happens on the day?',
|
||||
a: 'I usually start with everyone in one room. After that the parties often sit separately and I move between them. Some matters run that way from the beginning, with the parties never in the same room. You book either a half day or a full day, and which one you need is settled before the date is fixed.',
|
||||
a: `I usually start with everyone in one room. After that the parties often sit separately and I move between them. Some matters run that way from the beginning, with the parties never in the same room. You book either a half day or a full day. A half day is up to ${FEES.mediation.halfDay.hours} hours of mediation, a full day up to ${FEES.mediation.fullDay.hours} hours. Which one you need is settled before the date is fixed.`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
q: 'Does what I say stay private?',
|
||||
@@ -100,7 +97,7 @@ const FAQ = [
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
q: 'What does it cost, and who pays?',
|
||||
a: `${money(FEES.mediation.halfDay.amount)} for a half day, including ${FEES.mediation.halfDay.prepIncluded} hours of preparation, and ${money(FEES.mediation.fullDay.amount)} for a full day, including ${FEES.mediation.fullDay.prepIncluded} hours. ${FEES.taxNote} ${FEES.terms[0]}`,
|
||||
a: `${money(FEES.mediation.halfDay.amount)} for a half day, including up to ${FEES.mediation.halfDay.prepIncluded} hours of preparation, and ${money(FEES.mediation.fullDay.amount)} for a full day, including up to ${FEES.mediation.fullDay.prepIncluded} hours of preparation. Each party beyond two is ${money(FEES.mediation.additionalParty)}, and if a mediation runs beyond the time the fee covers there is an hourly charge as well. ${FEES.taxNote} ${FEES.terms[0]}`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
q: 'What if we do not settle?',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user