feat: apply six rulings; close Q22/Q44/Q45/Q46(b)/Q47; revert Q47's two graph fields

Pouya's rulings: Q44 (memberships current — ship the group), Q45 (PDF bio
deferred to step 9), Q46(a) (three offerings pass all gates), Q46(b) (§11
ratified as the source for definitional expansions, conditional on committing
the source), Q47 (set jobTitle and worksFor), the legal-advice formulation
ratified without change, and Q22 closed on his own execution evidence.

Q46(b): docs/reference/adrio-designations.md commits all five ADRIO expansions
with reproducible sha256 (four fetches each; both review agents independently
reproduced every digest). It immediately caught the error Pouya raised in the
same message — §11 had said "Chartered Mediator-Arbitrator" since the file was
created, ADRIO's term is "Chartered Med-Arbitrator", and the wrong form was in
dist/about/index.html. Four prior review passes read that string and checked
only whether it was sourced, not whether it was right.

Q47 REVERTED after both review agents struck it independently. jobTitle shipped
for one pass as "Mediator and Commercial Arbitrator" — the string claims-auditor
had removed from this same node's description the previous day, since §4 has no
row for a completed arbitration. The implementation flagged the wrong defect: it
argued about scoping and missed that the whole string was already struck. worksFor
was reverted because ProfessionalService.provider is this Person, so
provider -> Person -> worksFor asserts a same-entity claim transitively. Now
jobTitle: 'Mediator', no worksFor. Q49 asks for the two §4 rows.

Q44: memberships render with NO currency warranty (his condition), and R10 is
re-armed with an event trigger rather than a date since he declined renewal-date
tracking. Q22: §7 goes to PROVISIONED; R17 carries the first rotation date,
2026-11-26. New CLAUDE.md convention, his: never suppress stderr in a
verification script — suppression turns "it failed" into "it found nothing".

Two review rounds resolved 48 findings; the majority of the second round were
defects in the first round's fixes, including a re-widening of §4's renewal
period inside the comment that corrects that widening, a cited guard in
schema.ts that does not exist, and a struck §9 row describing a reverted state.
Three findings were one lift from a public page: docs/03's /for-parties/
directive breached D13 twice, docs/01 told an implementer an unpublishable strip
could ship, and docs/07 priced three ungated offerings with no gate note.

Also commits docs/reference/adrio-extract/ — the extraction script and its five
outputs, since the digests covered raw HTML and said nothing about the text the
term counts were run against. The equivalent gap for Q22's IAM verification is
NOT closed and is Q52.

Verified: astro check 0/0/0, eslint + prettier clean, build 2 pages, 0 .js
emitted, minifier guard silent, animation-timeline intact, no currency-warranty
phrasing in dist, JSON-LD correct on both pages.
NOT run: Lighthouse (tool unavailable until step 7, R11); HTML validator.

Opens Q48-Q53. Live reminders: R1, R10, R11, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e

docs/01-architecture.md

@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ to an appointment. This page carries the verifiable record.
    engineering, operating a company — told as one arc rather than three lists.
 3. **Credentials**, structured and scannable: designations, education,
    certifications, memberships. Every line from `AGENTS.md` §4 Verified.
-4. **The credentialing arc.** Q.Med held → Q.Arb in progress → C.Med-Arb as the
+4. **The credentialing arc.** Q.Med held → Q.Arb **commenced August 2026** →
+   C.Med-Arb as the
    endpoint. The brief (§V) treats the arc itself as part of the story; say so
    openly rather than implying a finished state.
 5. **Languages and cross-cultural practice.**
@@ -176,8 +177,14 @@ to an appointment. This page carries the verifiable record.
 7. `Person` JSON-LD. Downloadable one-page PDF bio — brief §VIII lists this as
    an asset for circulation with appointment proposals.
 
-> **The PDF bio does NOT ship with build step 3, and the omission is stated
-> rather than silent** — `AGENTS.md` Q45, opened 2026-08-28. No such file exists
+> **The PDF bio ships at BUILD STEP 9, alongside `/fees/` — deferred by Pouya
+> 2026-08-28 (Q45), tracked as `AGENTS.md` §12 **R16**.** His reasoning: it is a
+> derived artefact, so building it before `/about/` and `/fees/` are final means
+> building it twice, and an appointment proposal needs the fee card as much as
+> the bio. The two decisions below are **not** settled by the deferral and travel
+> with R16. Original note follows, and its reasoning is why this is R16 rather
+> than a to-do. **The PDF bio does NOT ship with build step 3, and the omission
+> is stated rather than silent** — `AGENTS.md` Q45, opened 2026-08-28. No such file exists
 > in the repo, and a link to one that does not exist is a broken link on the
 > page an appointing body reads. It is also not a formatting job: a one-page bio
 > is a **credential document** whose every line has to trace to §4 exactly as a
@@ -214,8 +221,11 @@ neutral.
 2. **Tracks:** documents-only, expedited, full hearing.
 3. **Rules:** ADRIC, ADR Chambers, ad hoc.
 4. Awards — form, reasoning, timing.
-5. **Credentialing status, stated plainly.** The Q.Arb pathway is in progress;
-   the page says so. **What is available now is all three forms — sole,
+5. **Credentialing status, stated plainly.** The Q.Arb pathway **commenced
+   August 2026**; the page says so in those words. *"In progress" was the
+   wording here until 2026-08-28 and it is barred — `docs/06`'s own cutover
+   checklist says "§4's wording, not the looser 'in progress'", and this is the
+   spec for the page that has to get it right.* **What is available now is all three forms — sole,
    party-appointed and co-arbitration** — and `AGENTS.md` §4 Offerings carries a
    row for each `[verified 2026-08-26 — Pouya]`. The page states that alongside
    the credentialing stage: Q.Arb commenced August 2026, C.Med-Arb is the
@@ -247,8 +257,20 @@ long-term narrative.
 
 Six cards, one paragraph each, linking onward. Also the natural home for the
 "also offered" strip: **early neutral evaluation, dispute-system design, and
-pre-dispute technical advisory** — three, and each now has an `AGENTS.md` §4
-Offerings row, which is what the strip needs before it may ship.
+pre-dispute technical advisory** — three, and each has an `AGENTS.md` §4
+Offerings row.
+
+> 🚫 **THE STRIP MAY NOT SHIP YET, AND HAVING A ROW IS NOT WHAT UNBLOCKS IT.**
+> All three rows read **"GATES 0 AND 2 ANSWERED; GATE 1 STILL HAS NO SOURCE —
+> NOT YET PUBLISHABLE"**. Pouya ruled on 2026-08-28 that all three pass; §4's
+> gate 1 asks *is the activity gated?*, which the register answers with a
+> checkable source and not with a ruling, and **no source exists for any of the
+> three**. Tracked as **Q46(a)**, which names this strip as the thing it blocks.
+>
+> This paragraph read *"each now has a §4 Offerings row, which is what the strip
+> needs before it may ship"* until 2026-08-28 — **false as stated**, and it would
+> have had an implementer at step 5 ship three offerings the register marks
+> unpublishable. Found by `claims-auditor` on re-audit.
 
 > **`settlement counsel` IS STRUCK FROM THIS STRIP AND MUST NOT BE RESTORED.**
 > `AGENTS.md` Q42, 2026-08-27. Pouya struck it as his own error in this document: