Pouya/adr-sml
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: build step 1 — scaffold, layout, header, footer, SEO; zero JavaScript

Browse Source 
Build order step 1 (docs/01): scaffold, tokens, base layout, header,
footer, SEO component, plus a temporary /type-scale/ proof sheet that
step 2 deletes.

THE FONTS WERE NEVER ON DISK. global.css declared six @font-face rules
pointing at /fonts/*.woff2 and public/fonts/ did not exist, so every
face had been silently falling back to Georgia and the system sans.
Six cuts committed, 123,804 bytes, SIL OFL 1.1, provenance in
docs/reference/fonts-provenance.md. ?v=1 on every URL because the
deploy script serves them immutable for a year.

ZERO JAVASCRIPT. The reveal was an inline IntersectionObserver in
<head>; docs/05 specifies script-src 'self' with no unsafe-inline, so
the only script on the site was the one thing the site's own CSP would
refuse to execute. Replaced with animation-timeline: view() behind
@supports. 0 script tags and 0 .js files in dist.

The infinity mark is lifted verbatim from the deployed site's own
smlMark loading thumbnail, not redrawn (Q32 asks whether a canonical
vector exists). The proof sheet computes its contrast table from
tokens.css rather than restating docs/02 — all eleven ratios reproduce
the measured table exactly.

Register: Canadian Tax Foundation added (§4, R10 widened); Q30 closed
— SML Company Ltd is federally incorporated under the CBCA, and the
footer publishes neither that nor the place of business; Q31 closed —
Plausible, on EU-only data residency (D15 amended). ROLE constants
added for "Director of Firm Operations" and "active litigation
exposure" so step 3 does not hand-type them.

Lighthouse unavailability now stated in six places rather than left as
a control that had silently stopped existing (§7, R11).

Both review agents ran twice. The second pass found four defects in
the first pass's fixes, including the minifier bug written back into
its own fix and a colour-alone repair that used the banned gold-on-
cream pairing at 2.10:1. Measured in headless Chrome at thirteen
widths with a seventh nav item injected: 0 overflow, 0 tap targets
under 44x44, 0 focus-order inversions, state indicators at 12.29:1,
755 words of body text with no JavaScript.

Opened: Q32-Q37. Closed: Q30, Q31.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF
This commit is contained in:
Pouya Lajevardi
2026-08-26 15:57:02 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 8f1df2c27c
commit 8134709548
33 changed files with 2575 additions and 147 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/01-architecture.md
+28 -5
View File
@@ -97,6 +97,23 @@ seat. The cost of getting this wrong is much higher than the cost of waiting.
Revisit at month 12–18, once there is relationship history to point to.
**This reasoning is Claude's, recorded for Pouya's decision — not yet his call.**
## Not a practice area yet: tax-adjacent disputes
**Canadian Tax Foundation membership is verified** (`AGENTS.md` §4, 2026-08-26)
and it is the one credential none of the six areas above touch. Tax-adjacent
disputes are genuinely ADR territory — valuation and purchase-price disputes on
a share sale, indemnity and earn-out fights that turn on a tax position,
shareholder splits where the assessment is the thing actually in dispute.
**There is no seventh practice page at launch,** for the same reason as the
section above and not a weaker one: a practice page is a claim of present
capability, and there is no track record to point at. A membership is a
credential, not a caseload.
It belongs on `/about/` with the other memberships. Revisit at the **month
12–18 review, alongside the Indigenous engagement decision** — one review, two
candidates. Tracked as `AGENTS.md` R3.
---
## Page specifications
@@ -176,9 +193,14 @@ neutral.
3. **Rules:** ADRIC, ADR Chambers, ad hoc.
4. Awards — form, reasoning, timing.
5. **Credentialing status, stated plainly.** The Q.Arb pathway is in progress;
the page says so and describes what is available now (co-arbitration,
co-arbitration) versus what follows designation. Honesty here is a
differentiator, not a weakness — and misstating it is a conduct problem.
the page says so and describes what is available now versus what follows
designation. Honesty here is a differentiator, not a weakness — and
misstating it is a conduct problem. **What "available now" consists of is
`AGENTS.md` Q36 and is NOT yet in §4** — this line, `03-content-spec.md`, and
`07-fees.md` all assert co-arbitration availability off the same unverified
premise. Do not write it onto the page until Q36 closes.
*(This paragraph read "(co-arbitration, co-arbitration)" until 2026-08-26 —
edited without being re-read, which is how the unverified half travelled.)*
6. Fees, booking.
### `/med-arb/`
@@ -326,8 +348,9 @@ anything.
### `/contact/`
Intake form (`05-backend-spec.md`), booking embed, direct email and phone
(Q3), Toronto by-appointment line, response-time expectation, and an explicit
Intake form (`05-backend-spec.md`), booking embed, direct email
(Q3 — **there is no public phone number**; render `CONTACT.phoneFallback`,
"By scheduled call", wherever a number would go), Toronto by-appointment line, response-time expectation, and an explicit
note that submitting the form does not create a retainer or a mediator–party
relationship and does not itself create a conflict check.