feat: D19 bounds the review loop; apply nine rulings; close Q46(a) and Q48–Q53

D19 into §3 and swept to all six destinations Pouya named: both agent briefs
(scope + severity filter), /build Phases 2–4 (non-gating questions, scope, stop
signal, two-round cap), /wrap, and CLAUDE.md (comments record decisions, not
history). Sweep verified by command, not recalled.

Rulings applied:
  Q46(a) PUBLISHABLE — three §4 Offerings rows flipped; gate 1 records
         [Pouya's stated basis], never [verified]. Step 5 unblocked.
  Q48    closed, not site-relevant.
  Q49    one §4 row, "Mediator"; read as declining Q49(b), so worksFor stays out.
  Q50    DEVIATES — ships as name + slogan, not the concatenation. Flagged.
  Q51    OBA sections stay; the regulator/voluntary distinction recorded.
  Q52    docs/reference/deploy-credential-verification.md — 18 read-only AWS
         calls, re-run rather than transcribed, access key ID redacted.
  Q53    memberOf emitted on /about/'s Person node.

Two review rounds. The headline finding was this session's own: the Q53 sweep
was asserted and never run, leaving six in-scope records saying memberOf was
withheld — including §12 R10, which is read aloud every session. Round 2 then
found that round 1's simplification had put memberOf on / as well; the per-page
opt-in is restored, because Pouya's ruling turns on /about/'s visible HTML.

Also fixed: MEMBERSHIP_ORGS had orphaned BOUTIQUE's D16 JSDoc; /'s title now
derives from the constants; §7's deploy row stated and retracted three facts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e

docs/06-deployment.md

@@ -356,34 +356,22 @@ Then invalidate `/*`.
       **Do NOT add a currency sentence to the page while you are here** — his
       ruling is *"list the memberships; promise nothing about their future
       state"*, and the struck sentence stays struck.
-      **Do NOT add `memberOf` to the Person JSON-LD** unless Pouya has said to.
-      It is withheld deliberately and on narrower grounds than the visible page:
-      the reason is recorded in `src/data/schema.ts` and **it is an open
-      judgement, not a settled one — `AGENTS.md` Q53.** Do not restate the
-      reasoning here; a third copy is how the first two went stale.
+      **`memberOf` IS EMITTED on `/about/`** — Q53 answered 2026-08-28 and the
+      withholding is dropped, so the graph asserts the same four memberships the
+      page shows. **This item therefore covers both**: re-confirming before
+      cutover means `src/data/schema.ts` as well as the visible list, and they
+      must not be allowed to diverge.
       **§4 records yearly renewal for the OBA sections and the CTF only** — it
       says nothing about ADRIC's or ADRIO's period, and an earlier version of
       this line asserted "all renew yearly", which §4 does not support.
-- [ ] **`AGENTS.md` Q51 answered before cutover** — does listing the **OBA
-      sections** on `/about/` carry the licensure implication that excludes the
-      LSO? §4 excludes the Law Society precisely because *"listing the Law Society
-      among memberships implies licensure"*, and Forbidden bars *any phrasing that
-      **implies** entitlement to practise law*. The OBA sections **went live on
-      `/about/` on 2026-08-28** and Q51 was raised the same day, **after** Pouya's
-      Q44 ruling authorised the group — so the ruling did not consider it.
-      `adversarial-reviewer` rates it moderate-low confidence as a defect and
-      **high confidence that the question is unasked**: `grep -n OBA AGENTS.md`
-      returns rows on renewal, scope and stamping and nothing on implication, and
-      OBA membership eligibility is not established anywhere in this repo. It sits
-      beside **R1** — same subject, same page, and not settleable internally. If
-      the answer is yes, the fix is the LSO fix: exclude deliberately, and record
-      that it was excluded rather than omitted.
-      *(This item did not exist until 2026-08-28. Q48, which governs nothing
-      currently on the site, had a checklist item while Q51, which governs live
-      public copy, had none.)*
-      **Also re-check `AGENTS.md` Q48** before re-stamping: if `Q.Med` retention
-      turns out to depend on ADRIO membership currency, this item covers the
-      site's central credential and not just a list
+- [ ] **The OBA sections stay listed; the LSO stays out** — a check that nobody
+      has tidied the two into one list, not an open question. `AGENTS.md` **Q51
+      answered 2026-08-28**: the Law Society is the **regulator**, so membership
+      *is* licensure; the OBA is a **voluntary association**, which admits
+      members it does not license. Structural, and independent of eligibility
+      details — which is what made the question unanswerable inside this repo
+      before the ruling. **R1 is still live**: same page, same subject, different
+      question
 - [ ] No `TODO(pouya)` remains in any shipped page
 - [ ] No matter counts, rates, dollar figures, or testimonials anywhere
 - [ ] Q.Arb described as **commenced August 2026** everywhere it appears — §4's