feat: D19 bounds the review loop; apply nine rulings; close Q46(a) and Q48–Q53

D19 into §3 and swept to all six destinations Pouya named: both agent briefs
(scope + severity filter), /build Phases 2–4 (non-gating questions, scope, stop
signal, two-round cap), /wrap, and CLAUDE.md (comments record decisions, not
history). Sweep verified by command, not recalled.

Rulings applied:
  Q46(a) PUBLISHABLE — three §4 Offerings rows flipped; gate 1 records
         [Pouya's stated basis], never [verified]. Step 5 unblocked.
  Q48    closed, not site-relevant.
  Q49    one §4 row, "Mediator"; read as declining Q49(b), so worksFor stays out.
  Q50    DEVIATES — ships as name + slogan, not the concatenation. Flagged.
  Q51    OBA sections stay; the regulator/voluntary distinction recorded.
  Q52    docs/reference/deploy-credential-verification.md — 18 read-only AWS
         calls, re-run rather than transcribed, access key ID redacted.
  Q53    memberOf emitted on /about/'s Person node.

Two review rounds. The headline finding was this session's own: the Q53 sweep
was asserted and never run, leaving six in-scope records saying memberOf was
withheld — including §12 R10, which is read aloud every session. Round 2 then
found that round 1's simplification had put memberOf on / as well; the per-page
opt-in is restored, because Pouya's ruling turns on /about/'s visible HTML.

Also fixed: MEMBERSHIP_ORGS had orphaned BOUTIQUE's D16 JSDoc; /'s title now
derives from the constants; §7's deploy row stated and retracted three facts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e

docs/07-fees.md

@@ -133,16 +133,14 @@ offer tribunal-secretary work on the site.
 Early neutral evaluation, dispute-system design, and pre-dispute technical
 advisory: **$500 / hour**.
 
-> 🚫 **A RATE IS NOT A PUBLICATION LICENCE, AND THESE THREE ARE NOT PUBLISHABLE
-> YET.** §4's ENE row says the pricing here *"is a fee-page question, not a
-> publication licence"*, and all three Offerings rows read **NOT YET
-> PUBLISHABLE** — gate 1 (*is the activity gated?*) has no source. **Q46(a)**
-> names `docs/07-fees.md` pricing directly as something it blocks.
->
-> So: the rate is recorded and settled; **the line item does not go on `/fees/`
-> until Q46(a) closes.** This note did not exist until 2026-08-28, which meant
-> the gate lived only in `AGENTS.md` while this file says "Build `/fees/` from
-> it". Found by `claims-auditor` on re-audit.
+> ✅ **PUBLISHABLE — Q46(a) closed 2026-08-28.** All three §4 Offerings rows
+> read PUBLISHABLE on Pouya's second ruling, so the line item may go on
+> `/fees/`. **Read the §4 ENE row first:** gate 1 is closed as **`[Pouya's
+> stated basis 2026-08-28]`**, not `[verified]` — there is still no source in
+> `docs/reference/` — and the framing constraints in `docs/01` §`/practice/`
+> travel with the offering onto this page. In particular, **ENE is priced as an
+> assessment delivered to both parties**, and nothing on `/fees/` may read as a
+> rate for advising one of them.
 
 **THREE services, not four. `settlement counsel` is struck and must not be
 priced** — `AGENTS.md` Q42, Pouya 2026-08-27, correcting his own entry in