10 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	610edc24fd	feat: Q.Arb is held; strike C.Med-Arb entirely; dissolve the paired disclosure ... Pouya's ruling, 2026-08-29. Treated as D3-class and swept accordingly. §4 Q.Arb becomes a HELD designation. Obtained July 2026 — recorded in the register, deliberately not published. Public copy carries "Q.Arb (ADRIC / ADRIO)" beside Q.Med and nothing more. Every stage form is struck: "commenced", "in progress", "pathway", "not yet". C.Med-Arb as a stated goal is struck. This DEVIATES FROM THE STRATEGY BRIEF, which made it "the explicit long-term professional narrative"; the brief is not in this repository, so the deviation is recorded in four places so nobody reinstates it from a document no reader can open. The designation stays in §11 as a definition — what is struck is its status as a goal of his. The paired-disclosure condition dissolves. It existed only because Q.Arb was in progress; there is no stage left to disclose, and a condition with no subject cannot be half-kept. Pages /about/'s credentialing arc is DELETED, not rewritten — two held designations are not a journey. /arbitration/ loses its stage section and its "Available now, and open about the stage" h1. /med-arb/'s endpoint section is rewritten. Deleting CREDENTIALS.goal/goalName rather than emptying them turned every consumer into a build error, which is how the last two surfaced. hasCredential now maps CREDENTIALS.designations instead of indexing [0]; _DesignationRowParity pins the visible credential row to the same constant. check:claims q-arb-as-a-stage (inverted from the predecessor, which barred Q.Arb reading as HELD) and c-med-arb-struck. Each page is now scanned twice — as published, and with inline tags collapsed — because [^<] cannot cross <strong>, which this site sets in prose. Two open questions for Pouya, neither blocking: Q55 — the acquisition date. §4 says obtained July 2026; the Change Log of 2026-08-26 records "commenced August 2026", both stamped [verified — Pouya]. They cannot both be true. Nothing published turns on it. Q56 — is the mediation offering scoped commercial? §4 leaves it unscoped; four surfaces say "commercial mediation"; /practice/insurance/ offers mediation in insured-versus-insurer SABS matters. Two review rounds, all findings applied or declined with a stated reason. Round 2 found ten lines in docs/03 still instructing the struck form — the 2026-08-29 sweep missed them because `git grep 'Q.Arb'` is line-anchored and the block never names it. Sweep the vocabulary, not only the subject. Gates, exit statuses read directly, never through a pipe: npm run check exit=0 (0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 hints) npm run lint exit=0 npm run build exit=0 (12 pages) npm run check:claims exit=0 (11 patterns, 26 approved strings) npm audit exit=0 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5	2026-08-30 10:37:19 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	79b19a7bd0	feat: build step 5 — /practice/ and six area pages; check:claims gates §4 in dist ... Step 5 ships /practice/ and the six practice-area pages (construction, technology, energy, insurance, shareholder, cross-border) from one route, and adds the mechanical §4 gate Pouya ruled for. check:claims — §4 Forbidden becomes a build error scripts/check-claims.mjs greps dist/**/*.html for 10 patterns, each carrying the incident that put it there. It strips <style> and non-JSON-LD <script> first (a bare sweep for "leading" returned 26 hits, 25 of them var(--leading-body)), self-tests every pattern against fixtures before sweeping, and refuses a missing, empty or stale dist/. Wired into /build Phase 5 and both deploy paths. Q54 — six conduct undertakings publish, and §4 gains a third class Conduct undertakings sit apart from credentials and offerings: the gate is that Pouya said it in terms. The strings live in CONDUCT_UNDERTAKINGS so a softening is one visible diff. (e) and (f) replace the third-person sentences already on /arbitration/ rather than joining them. Q49, Q50 recorded as rulings. §7 records the SES us-east-1 stray identity's deletion. R11 holds typescript at its current major, with the peer-range reason recorded. Three facts corrected, two of them already shipped - The LAT gloss said mediation "before filing and continuing after filing"; the Tribunal names mediation for "Before you apply" only and its second sentence is about negotiation. An ellipsis in docs/01 had deleted it. - "Connection allocation" is not an Ontario term. - "The 2026 privacy statute" does not exist — Bill C-27 died without royal assent. Struck from docs/03 rather than corrected in place. ADR Chambers struck from /arbitration/ and from docs/01 item 3 (Pouya, 2026-08-30): the source establishes what the firm publishes, not that an outside neutral can be appointed under its rules. claims-auditor gains a second lens — for every quoted source, whether the sentence beneath stays inside what the quotation establishes. Four shipped defects had that shape and none of them is greppable. CLAUDE.md gains a convention: never truncate the output of a check you intend to believe. `npm run check | tail -3` returns warnings, hints and a blank line and drops the errors line; it was reported as passing four times while astro check was exiting 1 with 10 type errors. Gates, exit status read directly, not through a pipe: npm run check exit=0 npm run lint exit=0 npm run build exit=0 npm run check:claims exit=0 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5	2026-08-30 09:35:26 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	f3138a0a79	feat: build step 4 — /mediation/, /arbitration/, /med-arb/; source ADRIC's rules ... Three pages, five in the build, zero JavaScript. /arbitration/ carries §4's paired-disclosure condition on four surfaces and Q39's struck universal appears in no form. /med-arb/ meets the procedural-fairness objection at the level of process design and ships deliberately without Pouya's own protocol commitments, which are Q54. docs/01 directed the mediation page to name the "ADRIC Model Mediation Rules". No such document exists — 0 occurrences across all four of ADRIC's rules pages against 10 for "National Mediation Rules"; "Model" belongs to the Model Dispute Resolution Clause inside the rules. Caught only because R14 requires the source before the claim. docs/reference/adric-rules.md + adric-extract/ carry it, with the digest drift measured rather than assumed: the HTML changes per request, the text extracts are byte-stable, so the extracts are the artefact. Four review passes, 21 defects, and the pattern was mine: I wrote the Q54 gate into the page and then breached it four times, then round 2 found two survivors of round 1's own fixes and one defect round 1's fix created. Also removed a <title> naming a practised role §4 does not grant, a habitual presupposing awards issued, and a claim about what ADRIC's rules permit that my own reference doc says is unsupported. Two instrument failures caught before they became conclusions: touch targets measured over file:// with no CSS loaded (uniform 18px, including on a .btn with a 44px floor), and a schema.org validator call that parsed nothing and returned 0 warnings for everything. Both re-run with the instrument validated first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e	2026-08-28 17:06:27 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	c576b9a85f	feat: build step 3 — /about/, minus its memberships; close Q40–Q43 ... Applies Pouya's rulings on Q42, Q41(a)(b)(c), Q43 and Q40, then builds `/about/` — six of docs/01's seven items. `/about/` ships WITHOUT a memberships group. R10 is a prohibition on shipping a page that lists memberships before they are re-confirmed; the re-confirmation is a fact only Pouya holds and was not obtained. The first version published all four and disclosed the gap in five places instead; both review agents rejected that. Q44 carries the question. Rulings: - Q42 — ENE, dispute-system design and pre-dispute technical advisory rowed; settlement counsel struck as a partisan role. The strike exposed a hole in the offering test, which now states the prior question it was missing. - Q41(a) — Q37 reaches prose, and prose is held to a higher bar. The sentence is now one constant, ASYMMETRY_LINE, because two hand-typed copies had already diverged inside one session. - Q41(b) — not restored; the implication turned out to be in three places, two of which survived the sweep that closed it. - Q41(c) — verified against the LAT's own Rules and extracted into docs/reference/lat-case-conference.md. Rule 2.4 makes "Pre-Hearing Conference" the Tribunal's own term for a case conference; the Rules contain zero occurrences of `mediat` in 66,593 characters. - Q43 — the timings are service commitments; PROCESS_FRAMING renders adjacent to them, not in a lede above. - Q40 — bundled to step 7 as R15, blocking cutover. Four review passes, 43 findings, nine of them defects in their own predecessors' fixes. The worst was mine: the false universal Q39 struck reached a public page. Also fixed a portrait ladder that upscaled 1.93x at 1024/DPR2 on BOTH pages — the shipped home page included — because its 960 ceiling was derived from the layout range where the image is narrowest. Verified: check/lint/build/audit clean; 0 upscaling across 11 device profiles; 0 overflow and 0 over-wide elements at 13 widths; 0 contrast failures across 127 and 88 painted pairs; 0 print failures against white paper; reveal 0 hidden under reduced-motion and print; zero JavaScript. Lighthouse NOT RUN — tool unavailable until step 7 (R11). HTML validator NOT RUN. Opens Q44 (memberships), Q45 (PDF bio), Q46 (offering-test gating; the glossary standard), Q47 (jobTitle without worksFor). Adds R15. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e	2026-08-28 12:10:41 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	165d259f5c	feat: build step 2 — the home page; close Q35, Q37, Q39; Q39's answer corrected the register ... Pouya's rulings and the page are one commit, not two, because they are not separable: Q37 changed the credential label the page renders, Q39 scoped the arbitration copy, and Q35 gave Med-Arb the row that lets the footer link stand. Splitting them would produce a commit where the register says one thing and the page says another. RULINGS Q39 — ANSWERED, and my assertion was FALSE as a universal. Pouya checked rather than defended. Family arbitration in Ontario is gated: prescribed training, 14h on screening for domestic violence and power imbalances, 30h of Ontario family law for arbitrators outside the bar, 10h ongoing per two years. claims-auditor produced that counter-example from inside the repo on 2026-08-26 and it was right. The source is now IN the repo per R14 — docs/reference/ontario-family-arbitration-training.md, retrieved with its provenance — and §4 states which half it establishes: the family gate directly, the commercial half only by absence. So "commercial arbitration in Ontario requires no licence and no designation" is recorded as Pouya's stated position, unstamped. What disposes of the question is the scope exclusion: he does not do family arbitration, so it is NOT OFFERED and the gate never bears on the practice. The false universal survived in three more live places, found by grep, not recall: §4's NOT-NEGOTIABLE boundary bullet (the boundary paragraph breaching its own boundary), §9's Q33 closure row, and a comment in SiteHeader.astro. Q35 — ANSWERED, all four items, and the answer supplied a gate that was missing. Med-Arb gets an Offerings row and stays in the footer sitemap. The six subject-matter labels pass test 1. §4 gains "Subject-matter areas — the publication gate": competence to accept an appointment, AND a page that frames it as positioning without claiming history. Nothing in the nav or footer is unrowed any more. Q37 — ANSWERED. "Law and engineering" becomes "Legal training and engineering practice". A degree is not a practice; the parallel was doing the implying. Q38/R13 — the committed SVG does not close it; the walk-back went too far. It renders faithfully BECAUSE it is the raster. R13 stays open. R1 — surfaced and acknowledged; the interim licensure framing is now carried by a shipped page rather than a spec, which raises the stakes. BUILD STEP 2 Seven of docs/01's eight home sections, six new components, zero JavaScript. Section 7 (Latest insights) ships at step 7 with the collection it lists — recorded in docs/01 and in the page, not just here. Four credential slots, not three: §4's paired-disclosure condition requires the Q.Arb stage on any page that offers arbitration. No booking link (R6). The masthead tagline is suppressed on / (it duplicated the hero eyebrow). The step-1 proof sheet is deleted, and five live references to it were found by grep. WHAT THE REVIEWS FOUND — 24 findings across the two passes claims-auditor FAILED it on ten, every one implication or scope rather than fabrication, which is where D13 says the risk lives. The four that mattered: "I mediate and arbitrate" asserted a track record §4 does not hold for arbitration; the JSON-LD asserted arbitration twice and stated the stage nowhere (a crawler-only claim is still a claim); "at one published rate with preparation time included" misdescribed money against docs/07's two day rates and capped prep allowance; and "Law and engineering are not blended here" was Q37's struck parallel relocated into prose one day after Pouya struck it. It also found the Canadian Tax Foundation missing from §9 Q8 — a stale second copy of a fact that would have bitten at step 3. adversarial-reviewer found fourteen, three blocking. The first was class="section-head" on <SectionHeading> never matching — the parent-cannot- style-a-child defect for the FOURTH time, written into a diff where I had just added fresh warnings about it to two other components. Measured: 0px margin, 0px gap, headings over the card edges, with astro check and eslint both clean. I had looked at a screenshot of that section and passed over it. Fixed with a page-owned wrapper (48px, measured) and the prop is deleted from six components so it is now a build error. Also: the credential row was never "two up on a phone" and its comment said it was; PROCESS was hardcoded in the page against the reason written in site.ts; 83px of residual overflow at a 200% default font size, now 3px. Seven more I found myself first, including <Picture widths> declaring the untouched 1600px master as the <img src> fallback (254,626 B for a 476px slot, and the build log said "before: 349kB" either way), and a prop named `as` silently turning off type-checking for a whole component. VERIFICATION — run, not asserted. Full figures in AGENTS.md entry (w). npx tsc 6.0.3 · check 0/0/0 · lint clean · build clean · audit 0 1 <script> and it is JSON-LD; non-JSON-LD scripts 0; no JS bundle; identical page with script execution disabled (444 nodes, 6,578 chars) Phase 5 minifier check: no `animation` shorthand beside animation-timeline overflow 0 at 14 widths, AND every mark measured at 1.5654-1.5657 vs 1.5657 one h1, no heading skips, focus order == DOM order across 44 focusables 31 painted contrast pairs at 3 widths, 0 failures 72/72 hit-test points across 8 cards resolve to the card's link print 0 hidden, reduced-motion 0 hidden Lighthouse NOT RUN — tool unavailable until step 7 (R11) HTML validator NOT RUN, and 4 of 12 srcsets carry a duplicate 1x descriptor Opened for Pouya: Q40 (one OG image for nineteen pages), Q41 (does Q37 reach prose; may the comparative be restored; what LAT pre-hearing mediation means), Q42 (the four "also offered" processes have no row), Q43 (the process timings are published commitments with no row). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e	2026-08-27 16:31:56 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	364b09632e	fix: replace the traced infinity mark with the real artwork; add §4 Offerings ... Q32 — the traced mark was a WRONG SHAPE and had shipped. Pouya compared it against the master and rejected it. Two grounds reproduce from the path and are verified here: all four cubic branches meet the origin at exactly 90 degrees, so the loops are tangent rather than crossing and at stroke-width 28 render as two kissing circles (signed crossing number 0; the strokes fuse across 61% of the mark's height at 2rem); and the master's ink bbox is 2668x1704 = 1.5657:1. The path is deleted, not kept as a fallback. Pouya's 1.23:1 figure is reconciled rather than left dangling: it is the bounding box of the path's COORDINATES, not the curve. Control points sit at y +/-160 where the curve reaches +/-120, so the hull is 400x320 and with stroke 428x348 = 1.2299. A trap rather than a slip — x is monotone, so the control points give the right width and a 33% inflated height, and the "does the width look right" check passes. The real artwork is now in the repo: master, tight crop (the render source, so the file's aspect ratio IS the mark's), full lockup, and the SVG. InfinityMark renders AVIF/WebP; a Retina device takes 3,063 B. Favicons regenerated; favicon.svg deleted. Q33/Q36 — Pouya accepts arbitration appointments now. §4 gains an Offerings category: competence for an offering, permission for a credential, with an explicit boundary so it cannot become a route around D13. The masthead tagline is restored, and the footer designation strip now carries "Q.Arb — commenced August 2026" so §4's paired-disclosure condition is actually met on every page rather than only asserted. Two conventions added to CLAUDE.md, both earned this session: anything a spec makes a claim about must be reachable from the repo (R14 — the traced mark survived two review passes because the artwork was not here to compare against); and a command that did not run is not evidence of absence (`timeout` is not installed on macOS, so four Drive reads never executed and were reported as an empty directory). Reviews: claims-auditor FAIL/13 and adversarial-reviewer 2 blocking, all resolved. The severe one was self-inflicted — `flex: none` landed on the <img> while <Picture>'s <picture> wrapper is the flex item, so the logo compressed to 28.5x32 at 1024px with seven nav items. The page-level overflow check passed throughout because the brand block absorbed the deficit by crushing the mark. Harness now asserts rendered aspect ratio. Opened: Q38, Q39. Closed: Q32, Q33, Q36. Narrowed: Q35. Added: R13, R14. AGENTS.md entry (v) carries a RESUME HERE section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF	2026-08-26 17:30:19 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	8134709548	feat: build step 1 — scaffold, layout, header, footer, SEO; zero JavaScript ... Build order step 1 (docs/01): scaffold, tokens, base layout, header, footer, SEO component, plus a temporary /type-scale/ proof sheet that step 2 deletes. THE FONTS WERE NEVER ON DISK. global.css declared six @font-face rules pointing at /fonts/*.woff2 and public/fonts/ did not exist, so every face had been silently falling back to Georgia and the system sans. Six cuts committed, 123,804 bytes, SIL OFL 1.1, provenance in docs/reference/fonts-provenance.md. ?v=1 on every URL because the deploy script serves them immutable for a year. ZERO JAVASCRIPT. The reveal was an inline IntersectionObserver in <head>; docs/05 specifies script-src 'self' with no unsafe-inline, so the only script on the site was the one thing the site's own CSP would refuse to execute. Replaced with animation-timeline: view() behind @supports. 0 script tags and 0 .js files in dist. The infinity mark is lifted verbatim from the deployed site's own smlMark loading thumbnail, not redrawn (Q32 asks whether a canonical vector exists). The proof sheet computes its contrast table from tokens.css rather than restating docs/02 — all eleven ratios reproduce the measured table exactly. Register: Canadian Tax Foundation added (§4, R10 widened); Q30 closed — SML Company Ltd is federally incorporated under the CBCA, and the footer publishes neither that nor the place of business; Q31 closed — Plausible, on EU-only data residency (D15 amended). ROLE constants added for "Director of Firm Operations" and "active litigation exposure" so step 3 does not hand-type them. Lighthouse unavailability now stated in six places rather than left as a control that had silently stopped existing (§7, R11). Both review agents ran twice. The second pass found four defects in the first pass's fixes, including the minifier bug written back into its own fix and a colour-alone repair that used the banned gold-on- cream pairing at 2.10:1. Measured in headless Chrome at thirteen widths with a seventh nav item injected: 0 overflow, 0 tap targets under 44x44, 0 focus-order inversions, state indicators at 12.29:1, 755 words of body text with no JavaScript. Opened: Q32-Q37. Closed: Q30, Q31. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF	2026-08-26 15:57:02 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	0d8b63380a	chore: install toolchain, wire lint, add local deploy path ... Answers four questions and starts build step 1. Q22 — the scoped deploy user does not exist: aws iam get-user returns NoSuchEntity. Recorded in §7 as NOT PROVISIONED and swept so that no file describes it as existing. §10 records that user/pouya, the broadly- permissioned personal user that has been authenticating to this account, must never be used in CI; scripts/deploy-local.sh refuses to run as it. Q23 — the Gitea instance reports 1.27.2, well above the vars-context floor, so the first-step guard is belt-and-braces rather than load-bearing. What remains is not a fact but a dependency: the instance is jointly administered, so enabling Actions and registering a runner both need a second admin. Hence npm run deploy (scripts/deploy-local.sh), which performs exactly what the workflow performs — same guard, same three passes, same headers, same invalidation. Documented as the current path, not as a workaround. §10 gains the risk that follows: the deploy secret will live on jointly administered infrastructure, where an instance admin can reach repo secrets. That does not change the plan, but it makes the scoped IAM policy the actual control between a shared Gitea instance and an AWS account holding another business's client-database backups. Never widen it. Q27 — response time is two business days, in site.ts with a derived short form so the confirmation email cannot drift from the page. Q28 — OBA sections confirmed, stamped "for now"; membership renews yearly, tracked as R10. Build step 1: dependencies installed and package-lock.json created, closing the npm ci blocker. ESLint flat config and Prettier config added; npm run lint, check and build all pass. Prettier deliberately excludes *.md and tokens.css — reasons recorded in .prettierignore. npm audit reports 7 high-severity advisories, all requiring an Astro major upgrade. Not applied; escalated in AGENTS.md entry (s) as a decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF	2026-08-26 11:54:04 -04:00
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5	6bf1167624	fix: sweep D3 amendment through the specs; correct inverted DKIM table ... The re-audit of the deploy-guard change surfaced defects well outside the diff, including one that would have broken production mail. docs/05-backend-spec.md had the two SES DKIM sets exactly inverted, labelling the three records that resolve as "orphans" and the three NXDOMAIN records as "Live. Never delete". Entry (j) corrected this in AGENTS.md §7 and the correction never reached docs/05. Since SES has no custom MAIL FROM, DKIM is the only thing satisfying DMARC, so acting on that table would have silently broken intake mail authentication. Also in this change: - .gitea/workflows/deploy.yml gains a guard as steps[0] that fails the run, naming the variable, if AWS_REGION, S3_BUCKET or CLOUDFRONT_DISTRIBUTION_ID is empty — how a Gitea too old for the vars context manifests. Verified fail-closed under bash -e, sh -e and bash -euo pipefail. - AGENTS.md Current Truth: SPF and DMARC recorded as present (Q20), the matching §10 High risk row retired, three duplicate Q rows removed. - docs/reference/AWS-Hosting-Guide.md tracked and given a do-not-execute banner; it was an executable procedure for the architecture D1/D3 replace. - Copy decks: "a working litigator" and "an active litigation practice" replaced with the register's own wording; LegalService JSON-LD replaced with ProfessionalService; tribunal-secretary offers removed per D14; nine stale question blockers swept. - astro.config.mjs: prefetchAll disabled — it injected JS into every page against the zero-JS convention with no decision recorded. - src/data/site.ts: unregistered response-time commitment nulled (Q27); OBA section names downgraded to [assumed] (Q28). - s3:AbortMultipartUpload reasoning corrected to measure ./dist, not the repo. Opens Q27, Q28, Q29. AGENTS.md entry (q) records the full resolution, including the findings declined and why. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF	2026-08-26 11:28:42 -04:00
Pouya Lajevardi	19f7226661	chore: project scaffold, specs, and working record	2026-08-26 08:51:16 -04:00