---
description: Run the adversarial review pass on demand — on the working tree, a commit range, or named files.
argument-hint: [what to review — defaults to uncommitted changes]
---

**ultrathink**

Scope: $ARGUMENTS

If no scope is given, review the uncommitted working tree (`git status`,
`git diff`).

Invoke **`adversarial-reviewer`** on that scope.

**`claims-auditor` is not part of this command — D20, Pouya, 2026-08-30.** The
claims pass runs **once, at cutover**, over the whole finished site; `AGENTS.md`
D20 records the reasoning and the measured cost of deferring it. Run it here only
if Pouya asks for it by name in `$ARGUMENTS` — in which case say in the report
that it was run out of band, and against a draft rather than the finished site,
because that is the condition D20 says weakens it.

Give it the diff and the relevant specs from `docs/`. **Do not brief it on why
the code is correct** — that anchors the review and turns it into agreement.

Report findings grouped by severity, most severe first. For each: the defect, the
concrete failure it produces, and the fix. Do not fix anything yet — Pouya
decides what gets addressed. Then ask what he wants done.