adr-sml/src/pages/fees.astro

---
/**
 * `/fees/` — build step 9. Spec: docs/01 §`/fees/`, docs/03 §Fees,
 * **docs/07-fees.md is the authority on every number here.**
 *
 * ⚠️ **EVERY FIGURE IS INTERPOLATED FROM `FEES`. NOT ONE IS TYPED.** This is the
 * page D8 commits to and the one where a hand-typed number would be an incorrect
 * price rather than an untidy fact. `docs/07` §All parameters confirmed sets the
 * publication rules the interpolation has to satisfy, and two of them are
 * wording rather than value:
 *
 *  1. **The preparation allowance is CAPPED and must READ as capped** —
 *     *"including **up to** 2 hours of preparation"*. Never "including 2 hours",
 *     which sells an entitlement, and never "preparation included", which sells
 *     an uncapped one. `/for-parties/` shipped the flat form for one pass, on the
 *     one page written for a reader with no counsel to catch it.
 *  2. **The session cap and the preparation allowance are DIFFERENT THINGS with
 *     different nouns** — `hours` is time in the session, `prepIncluded` is
 *     preparation bundled into the fee. Folding them into one figure is the
 *     ambiguity Q58 was opened to fix, and it was an ambiguity in `docs/07`
 *     itself rather than in any copy.
 *
 * ✅ **Q59 IS RULED AND THIS PAGE IS WHY IT MATTERED — Pouya, 2026-08-31.**
 * Overtime runs from the **session cap**: the fourth hour of a half day, the
 * seventh of a full day. Until that ruling this page could not publish the
 * $500 rate at all, because a rate printed beside "up to 3 hours" defines its
 * own trigger by adjacency and there was no other quantity for it to attach to.
 *
 * ⚠️ **AND THE RULING'S SECOND HALF IS NOT DECORATION — IT IS WHAT KEEPS THE
 * PAGE FROM READING AS AN ARITHMETIC MISTAKE.** `FEES.mediation.reservation`:
 * *a full day reserves the day; half-day overtime is subject to availability.*
 * Without it a reader adds up `2000 + 500 × 3 = 3500` against `4000` and
 * concludes the full-day rate is simply worse — which is a real feature of D14's
 * figures (§12 R5 carries it, with the table in `docs/07` §Recorded dissent) and
 * is answered by what the full-day fee actually buys. So the reservation
 * sentence ships **adjacent to the overtime row**, not in a footnote. Same
 * structural rule as `PROCESS_FRAMING` beside the five timings under Q43.
 *
 * ✅ **MED-ARB IS PRICED HERE AS OF 2026-09-03, AND IT CARRIES NO FIGURE.**
 * Pouya's ruling closing D20 finding 10: it is billed **by phase**, each phase
 * at the rates already on this page. The finding was that the hero promises
 * *"Every figure is on this page"* while §4 Offerings carries a Med-Arb row
 * that `docs/07` priced nowhere — a promise wider than the card. It is closed by
 * pricing the offering, not by narrowing the promise, so the hero sentence is
 * unchanged and is now true as written. **Do not give the section a rate row:**
 * a med-arb figure would be a fourth price for a process priced twice, and the
 * first thing it would do is disagree with one of them. `FEES.medArb` holds the
 * three sentences; `docs/07` §Med-arb holds the rule. INTERIM, reviewed at R5.
 *
 * ⚠️ **NO TRIBUNAL-SECRETARY RATE AND NO SETTLEMENT COUNSEL.** Both are struck
 * rows in §4 Offerings — the first removed by Pouya from D14, the second by him
 * as his own error in `docs/01`. **A rate on a fee page is an offer**, which is
 * exactly why they are struck here rather than merely unpriced.
 *
 * ⚠️ **ARBITRATION IS SCOPED COMMERCIAL, MEDIATION IS NOT.** The asymmetry is
 * designed (Q39, Q56): family arbitration in Ontario carries prescribed training
 * and is separately NOT OFFERED, so the scope on the arbitration rows is a legal
 * gate. Mediation has no equivalent gate and is unscoped on purpose. A later
 * editor tidying these into a matching pair would reintroduce the defect.
 */
import BaseLayout from '../layouts/BaseLayout.astro';
import Button from '../components/Button.astro';
import ContactBand from '../components/ContactBand.astro';
import Eyebrow from '../components/Eyebrow.astro';
import SectionHeading from '../components/SectionHeading.astro';
import { getImage } from 'astro:assets';
import ogDefault from '../assets/og-portrait.jpg';
import { pageGraph } from '../data/schema';
import { FEES } from '../data/site';

const ldImage = await getImage({
  src: ogDefault,
  format: 'jpeg',
  width: 1200,
  height: 630,
});

/* No `Service` node, and no `Offer` node either. The Person alone — the
   `/practice/` and `/process/` shape. `/mediation/` and `/arbitration/` already
   carry the `Service` nodes for what is priced here, and a second one on this
   path would put a duplicate `@id` in the graph. An `Offer` with `price` would
   be the obvious addition and is deliberately not made: schema.org's `Offer`
   models a single price for a single item, and every row below is conditional on
   session length, party count and format — a machine-readable $2,000 with none
   of those conditions attached is a worse claim than no claim.
   ⚠️ AND `/`'s NODE CARRIES NO PRICE EITHER — this comment said
   `ProfessionalService.priceRange` "carries the range instead", and that field
   was removed the same day for mixing units and understating its own floor.
   Nothing on this site states a price in machine-readable form, deliberately:
   every figure here is conditional on session length, party count or format,
   and a number without those conditions is a worse claim than no number.
   Found by `adversarial-reviewer` round 2 — a justification resting on a field
   that no longer exists is how an `Offer` node gets added by the next reader. */
const graph = pageGraph(new URL(ldImage.src, Astro.site).href);

const money = (amount: number) =>
  new Intl.NumberFormat('en-CA', {
    style: 'currency',
    currency: FEES.currency,
    maximumFractionDigits: 0,
  }).format(amount);

const { halfDay, fullDay } = FEES.mediation;

/* The two mediation rows, built from the constants so the noun and the "up to"
   travel with the number rather than being retyped beside it. */
const MEDIATION_ROWS = [
  {
    item: `Half day — up to ${halfDay.hours} hours of session`,
    detail: `Fee includes up to ${halfDay.prepIncluded} hours of preparation.`,
    fee: money(halfDay.amount),
  },
  {
    item: `Full day — up to ${fullDay.hours} hours of session`,
    detail: `Fee includes up to ${fullDay.prepIncluded} hours of preparation.`,
    fee: money(fullDay.amount),
  },
  {
    item: 'Each party beyond two',
    detail: 'Per party, added to the session fee.',
    fee: money(FEES.mediation.additionalParty),
  },
  {
    item: 'Overtime, per hour',
    /* Q59: the trigger is the SESSION cap, and the reservation point ships in
       the same cell as the rate. See the header for why it is not a footnote. */
    detail: `Charged beyond the ${halfDay.hours} or ${fullDay.hours} session hours the fee covers. ${FEES.mediation.reservation}`,
    fee: money(FEES.mediation.overtimePerHour),
  },
];

const ARBITRATION_ROWS = [
  {
    item: 'Hourly',
    detail: 'Procedural work, document review, award writing.',
    fee: money(FEES.arbitration.perHour),
  },
  {
    item: 'Hearing day',
    detail: 'In person or by video, at the same rate.',
    fee: money(FEES.arbitration.hearingDay),
  },
  {
    item: 'Documents-only or expedited — simple',
    detail: 'Flat fee.',
    fee: money(FEES.arbitration.documentsOnlySimple),
  },
  {
    item: 'Documents-only or expedited — complex',
    detail: 'Flat fee.',
    fee: money(FEES.arbitration.documentsOnlyComplex),
  },
];
---

<BaseLayout
  title="Fees · Mediation and Arbitration Rates · Pouya Lajevardi"
  description="The full rate card: half-day and full-day mediation, arbitration, cancellation terms and what an overrun costs. Published in full, with no ranges."
  jsonLd={graph}
>
  {/* ---- 1. Hero -------------------------------------------------------- */}
  <section class="section hero">
    <div class="wrap">
      <Eyebrow dot>Fees</Eyebrow>
      <h1 class="display hero-h">
        Published in full, including what overruns cost.
      </h1>
      {
        /* ⚠️ THIS SENTENCE QUOTED A PHRASE THE SPEC BARS, AND THE QUOTATION WAS
          THE PROBLEM. It read: *No ranges, no "starting from", and nothing that
          has to be asked for.* Two defects in one clause. (1) It defines the
          page against an unnamed practice — an implied comparative, which Q41(b)
          answers: assert his capability, never the field's. (2) It plants the
          literal string `starting from` in `dist/`, where a future sweep for
          `docs/03`'s "no 'starting from' evasions" would hit it and read a
          negation as a breach — the `I aLSO practise` / `the pLEADINGs` shape,
          manufactured on purpose by the copy. Stating what the page DOES needs
          no comparison and leaves nothing to trip over. */
      }
      <p class="hero-lede">
        One rate for all mediation matters, whatever the subject. Every figure
        is on this page, and none of it has to be asked for. {FEES.taxNote}
      </p>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 2. Mediation --------------------------------------------------- */}
  <section class="section section-alt reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading
          eyebrow="Mediation"
          level={2}
          lede="One rate for every matter. Preparation is bundled into the fee and is capped."
        >
          <span slot="heading">Half day or full day.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      <dl class="rates">
        {
          MEDIATION_ROWS.map((row) => (
            <div class="rate">
              <dt>
                <span class="rate-item">{row.item}</span>
                <span class="rate-detail">{row.detail}</span>
              </dt>
              <dd>{row.fee}</dd>
            </div>
          ))
        }
      </dl>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 3. Arbitration ------------------------------------------------- */}
  <section class="section reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading
          eyebrow="Arbitration"
          level={2}
          lede="Sole, party-appointed and co-arbitration appointments, in commercial matters."
        >
          <span slot="heading">Hourly, by hearing day, or flat.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      <dl class="rates">
        {
          ARBITRATION_ROWS.map((row) => (
            <div class="rate">
              <dt>
                <span class="rate-item">{row.item}</span>
                <span class="rate-detail">{row.detail}</span>
              </dt>
              <dd>{row.fee}</dd>
            </div>
          ))
        }
      </dl>
      {
        /* The Q39 scope, stated on the page rather than left to the lede. §4
          Offerings carries a NOT OFFERED row for family arbitration, and
          `/practice/shareholder/` makes the same exclusion in one sentence on
          Pouya's instruction — "one sentence, not a section", because a
          disclaimer that grows reads as defensive. */
      }
      <p class="scope-note">
        Family arbitration under the <em>Family Law Act</em> is not offered, and family
        law matters are not accepted.
      </p>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 4. Med-arb ------------------------------------------------------ */}
  <section class="section section-alt reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading
          eyebrow="Med-arb"
          level={2}
          lede="One appointment, two processes. Each phase is charged at the rates for that process."
        >
          <span slot="heading">Billed by phase.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      {
        /* NO `<dl class="rates">` HERE, AND THE ABSENCE IS THE POINT — see the
          header. Every other section on this page pairs an item with a figure;
          this one has no figure of its own, and giving it a row would mean
          inventing one. The three sentences come from `FEES.medArb` so the rule
          lives beside the numbers it points at rather than in this template. */
      }
      <ul class="notes" role="list">
        <li>{FEES.medArb.rule}</li>
        <li>{FEES.medArb.noSeparateFee}</li>
        <li>{FEES.medArb.termsApply}</li>
      </ul>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 5. Other services ---------------------------------------------- */}
  <section class="section reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading
          eyebrow="Also offered"
          level={2}
          lede="Charged hourly, with an estimate agreed in the terms of appointment."
        >
          <span slot="heading">Three things beside the two processes.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      <dl class="rates">
        <div class="rate">
          <dt>
            <span class="rate-item">Early neutral evaluation</span>
            {
              /* §4's ENE row and `docs/01` §`/practice/` both require this
                framing, and `docs/07` repeats it for this page in terms:
                "nothing on `/fees/` may read as a rate for advising one of
                them." ENE is the offering nearest §4's NOT-NEGOTIABLE boundary,
                because a neutral assessment of the merits sits closest to
                providing legal services. */
            }
            <span class="rate-detail">
              A reasoned assessment of the merits, delivered to both parties
              together. Never advice to one of them.
            </span>
          </dt>
          <dd>{money(FEES.hourly)}<span class="per"> / hour</span></dd>
        </div>
        <div class="rate">
          <dt>
            <span class="rate-item">Dispute-system design</span>
            <span class="rate-detail">
              Advising an organisation on how its future disputes should be
              handled, before there are any.
            </span>
          </dt>
          <dd>{money(FEES.hourly)}<span class="per"> / hour</span></dd>
        </div>
        <div class="rate">
          <dt>
            <span class="rate-item">Pre-dispute technical advisory</span>
            {
              /* THE CONFLICT CAUTION IS NOT OPTIONAL. §4's row: "no copy may
                imply the offering is free of that tension", and it names
                `/practice/`'s strip as where the temptation would arise. A fee
                page is the second such place, because a priced line reads as a
                product. Advisory work for one organisation can conflict against
                a later appointment in the same matter. */
            }
            <span class="rate-detail">
              Technical review before a dispute exists. Taking it on can rule me
              out of a later appointment in the same matter, and that is settled
              in writing before the work starts.
            </span>
          </dt>
          <dd>{money(FEES.hourly)}<span class="per"> / hour</span></dd>
        </div>
      </dl>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 6. Cancellation ------------------------------------------------ */}
  <section class="section section-alt reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading
          eyebrow="Cancellation"
          level={2}
          lede="A reserved date is time that cannot be given to another matter. The schedule is published so it is never a surprise."
        >
          <span slot="heading">If a date is cancelled.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      <dl class="rates">
        {
          FEES.cancellation.map((row) => (
            <div class="rate">
              <dt>
                <span class="rate-item">{row.window}</span>
              </dt>
              <dd class="dd-text">{row.fee}</dd>
            </div>
          ))
        }
      </dl>
      <ul class="notes" role="list">
        {FEES.cancellationNotes.map((note) => <li>{note}</li>)}
      </ul>
    </div>
  </section>

  {/* ---- 7. Terms -------------------------------------------------------- */}
  <section class="section section-inverse reveal">
    <div class="wrap">
      <div class="section-head">
        <SectionHeading eyebrow="Terms" level={2}>
          <span slot="heading">How the account works.</span>
        </SectionHeading>
      </div>
      <ul class="notes" role="list">
        <li>{FEES.taxNote}</li>
        {FEES.terms.map((term) => <li>{term}</li>)}
        <li>
          Travel outside the Greater Toronto Area is billed separately, or
          bundled at a day rate stated in the terms of appointment.
        </li>
        <li>
          Everything above is confirmed in the terms of appointment before an
          engagement begins. Nothing on this page is an appointment.
        </li>
      </ul>
      <div class="cta">
        <Button href="/contact/" variant="gold"
          >Request a consultation &rarr;</Button
        >
        <Button href="/process/" variant="ghost"
          >How an engagement runs &rarr;</Button
        >
      </div>
    </div>
  </section>

  <ContactBand />
</BaseLayout>

<style>
  .hero {
    padding-block-start: var(--space-9);
  }
  .hero-h {
    margin-block: var(--space-4) var(--space-5);
    font-size: var(--text-6xl);
  }
  .hero-lede {
    max-inline-size: 58ch;
    font-size: var(--text-lg);
    line-height: var(--leading-body);
    color: var(--text-secondary);
  }

  /* --- The rate rows ---------------------------------------------------- */

  /* A `<dl>`, not a `<table>`. Each row is one item and its price — a
     term-and-value pair — and a two-column table of eight rows reflows badly on
     a phone, where the price ends up under a wrapped item name with no
     alignment left to carry the association. The `<dt>`/`<dd>` pair keeps that
     association semantically whatever the layout does. */
  .rates {
    display: grid;
    gap: 0;
    max-inline-size: 56rem;
    border-block-start: 1px solid var(--border);
  }
  .rate {
    display: flex;
    flex-wrap: wrap;
    justify-content: space-between;
    align-items: baseline;
    gap: var(--space-3) var(--space-5);
    padding-block: var(--space-5);
    border-block-end: 1px solid var(--border);
  }
  .rate dt {
    display: flex;
    flex-direction: column;
    gap: var(--space-2);
    /* Leaves room for the fee on one line at tablet width and up, and wraps
       under it below that. */
    flex: 1 1 22rem;
  }
  .rate-item {
    font-size: var(--text-lg);
    line-height: var(--leading-snug);
  }
  .rate-detail {
    font-size: var(--text-sm);
    line-height: var(--leading-body);
    color: var(--text-meta);
    max-inline-size: 52ch;
  }
  .rate dd {
    font-family: var(--font-serif);
    font-size: var(--text-2xl);
    line-height: var(--leading-tight);
    white-space: nowrap;
  }
  /* The cancellation column is a sentence, not a figure, so it takes body type
     and is allowed to wrap. */
  .rate .dd-text {
    flex: 1 1 16rem;
    font-family: var(--font-sans);
    font-size: var(--text-base);
    line-height: var(--leading-body);
    color: var(--text-secondary);
    white-space: normal;
  }
  .per {
    font-family: var(--font-sans);
    font-size: var(--text-sm);
    color: var(--text-meta);
  }

  .scope-note {
    margin-block-start: var(--space-6);
    max-inline-size: var(--width-prose);
    font-size: var(--text-base);
    line-height: var(--leading-body);
    color: var(--text-secondary);
  }

  .notes {
    /* No `list-style: none` or `padding: 0` — `global.css` applies both to
       `ul[role='list']`, and a second copy is a second thing to keep true. */
    display: grid;
    gap: var(--space-4);
    margin-block-start: var(--space-6);
    max-inline-size: var(--width-prose);
  }
  .notes li {
    padding-inline-start: var(--space-5);
    border-inline-start: 1px solid var(--rule);
    line-height: var(--leading-body);
  }

  .cta {
    display: flex;
    flex-wrap: wrap;
    gap: var(--space-3) var(--space-4);
    margin-block-start: var(--space-8);
  }
</style>