Analyse now classifies up to ten same-kind transactions per provider
request: the registry and history travel once per batch, so a
thousand-row backfill costs about a hundred paced requests instead of a
thousand. The answer schema appears once — an array item carrying an
enum-bound ref — because providers meter strict schemas by token cost:
duplicating registry enums per row, or bounding arrays with
minItems/maxItems that Gemini expands per element, rejects real
registries with a bare HTTP 400. Row count, duplicate refs, duplicate
tags and taxonomy bounds are all enforced server-side instead, and a
request still rejected outright halves until accepted, remembering the
working size for the run. Batch requests scale the HTTP budget by row
count, chunk failures cannot abort a run whose later rows succeeded,
and rows resolved against one snapshot share one minted merchant.
Measured on a real 165-row month over a zero-data-retention route:
165 analysed, 152 proposals, 0 errors, 17 requests, under 8 minutes.
Fresh installs default to google/gemini-3.8-flash, the model that
demonstrably honors strict structured outputs over a ZDR route. Preview
changes now carry counterparty, amount and currency, and the review
list shows the amount with a counterparty fallback for banks that leave
descriptions empty.
Strict structured-output mode rejects uniqueItems, so every request to a
gpt-5.6-family zero-data-retention endpoint failed with HTTP 400 behind
a generic error; duplicates were already rejected server-side, so the
keyword leaves the wire schemas, pinned by a strict-keyword allowlist
test built from the ledger that hit this.
The bare-BIC redaction pattern deleted every 8- and 11-letter word —
Openbank, BAUMARKT, RACETRACKER — blinding the model to the payee it
was asked to classify and tripping the unsafe-merchant check on honest
answers. BICs now die only labeled or attached to their IBAN, account
labels join the redaction secrets, an identifier-shaped merchant name
degrades to a merchant-less proposal instead of failing the row, and a
provider error inside an HTTP 200 envelope is reported as such (numeric
code only) instead of as envelope corruption.
Lars Nolden