feat: build step 3 — /about/, minus its memberships; close Q40–Q43

Applies Pouya's rulings on Q42, Q41(a)(b)(c), Q43 and Q40, then builds
`/about/` — six of docs/01's seven items.

`/about/` ships WITHOUT a memberships group. R10 is a prohibition on
shipping a page that lists memberships before they are re-confirmed; the
re-confirmation is a fact only Pouya holds and was not obtained. The
first version published all four and disclosed the gap in five places
instead; both review agents rejected that. Q44 carries the question.

Rulings:
- Q42 — ENE, dispute-system design and pre-dispute technical advisory
  rowed; settlement counsel struck as a partisan role. The strike
  exposed a hole in the offering test, which now states the prior
  question it was missing.
- Q41(a) — Q37 reaches prose, and prose is held to a higher bar. The
  sentence is now one constant, ASYMMETRY_LINE, because two hand-typed
  copies had already diverged inside one session.
- Q41(b) — not restored; the implication turned out to be in three
  places, two of which survived the sweep that closed it.
- Q41(c) — verified against the LAT's own Rules and extracted into
  docs/reference/lat-case-conference.md. Rule 2.4 makes "Pre-Hearing
  Conference" the Tribunal's own term for a case conference; the Rules
  contain zero occurrences of `mediat` in 66,593 characters.
- Q43 — the timings are service commitments; PROCESS_FRAMING renders
  adjacent to them, not in a lede above.
- Q40 — bundled to step 7 as R15, blocking cutover.

Four review passes, 43 findings, nine of them defects in their own
predecessors' fixes. The worst was mine: the false universal Q39 struck
reached a public page. Also fixed a portrait ladder that upscaled 1.93x
at 1024/DPR2 on BOTH pages — the shipped home page included — because
its 960 ceiling was derived from the layout range where the image is
narrowest.

Verified: check/lint/build/audit clean; 0 upscaling across 11 device
profiles; 0 overflow and 0 over-wide elements at 13 widths; 0 contrast
failures across 127 and 88 painted pairs; 0 print failures against white
paper; reveal 0 hidden under reduced-motion and print; zero JavaScript.
Lighthouse NOT RUN — tool unavailable until step 7 (R11). HTML validator
NOT RUN.

Opens Q44 (memberships), Q45 (PDF bio), Q46 (offering-test gating; the
glossary standard), Q47 (jobTitle without worksFor). Adds R15.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e

.claude/agents/claims-auditor.md

@@ -66,8 +66,17 @@ goes stale where nobody re-reads it.
 
 **OCNI is not current** — flag it. **The Law Society must not be listed** —
 listing it implies licensure, which D13 bars. Flag any addition of either,
-however well-intentioned. Memberships renew yearly (§12 R10), so a §4 row can be
-verified and still be out of date; check the stamp, not just the presence.
+however well-intentioned.
+
+**The OBA sections and the Canadian Tax Foundation renew yearly (§12 R10)** — and
+read that scope, because this sentence carried the widened form *"Memberships
+renew yearly"* until 2026-08-28. §4 records the period for **those four lines
+only**; it says nothing about ADRIC's or ADRIO's. **You found this yourself**, in
+your own brief, on the pass where you found the same widening in three source
+files — the third stale claim located inside this file, which is why the
+instruction below is the one that matters: a §4 row can be verified and still be
+out of date, so **read the §4 row at audit time and check the stamp**, never this
+gloss.
 
 **Testimonials, endorsements, third-party quotes.** None exist. Any is a
 fabrication.