Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
f3138a0a79
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Three pages, five in the build, zero JavaScript. /arbitration/ carries §4's paired-disclosure condition on four surfaces and Q39's struck universal appears in no form. /med-arb/ meets the procedural-fairness objection at the level of process design and ships deliberately without Pouya's own protocol commitments, which are Q54. docs/01 directed the mediation page to name the "ADRIC Model Mediation Rules". No such document exists — 0 occurrences across all four of ADRIC's rules pages against 10 for "National Mediation Rules"; "Model" belongs to the Model Dispute Resolution Clause inside the rules. Caught only because R14 requires the source before the claim. docs/reference/adric-rules.md + adric-extract/ carry it, with the digest drift measured rather than assumed: the HTML changes per request, the text extracts are byte-stable, so the extracts are the artefact. Four review passes, 21 defects, and the pattern was mine: I wrote the Q54 gate into the page and then breached it four times, then round 2 found two survivors of round 1's own fixes and one defect round 1's fix created. Also removed a <title> naming a practised role §4 does not grant, a habitual presupposing awards issued, and a claim about what ADRIC's rules permit that my own reference doc says is unsupported. Two instrument failures caught before they became conclusions: touch targets measured over file:// with no CSS loaded (uniform 18px, including on a .btn with a 44px floor), and a schema.org validator call that parsed nothing and returned 0 warnings for everything. Both re-run with the instrument validated first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0148NztQskLKKApP5SzAA78e
44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# The extracted text behind `../adric-rules.md`
|
|
|
|
**Why this directory exists, and why it matters more here than for ADRIO.**
|
|
Every term count in `../adric-rules.md` — including Finding 1, which corrected a
|
|
rule-set name `docs/01` had directed onto a public page — was run against these
|
|
extracts, not against the raw HTML. R14: a count taken from an artefact nobody
|
|
can reach is unverifiable by construction.
|
|
|
|
**And unlike the ADRIO fetch, the HTML digests here do not reproduce.** The
|
|
served pages change on every request. `../adric-rules.md` §Provenance records
|
|
the two measured digests and the four causes read out of the diff. **The
|
|
extracts below are byte-stable across those re-fetches** — verified, not
|
|
assumed: a second fetch of the mediation-rules page produced different HTML and
|
|
an identical `.txt`.
|
|
|
|
So for these pages, **the `.txt` files are the artefact and the digests are only
|
|
a record of what was fetched.**
|
|
|
|
## Reproducing
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
curl -sSL -o <slug>.html "https://adric.ca/rules-codes/<path>/"
|
|
node ../adrio-extract/extract.mjs <slug>.html > <slug>.txt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The four URLs and their slugs are in the provenance table of
|
|
`../adric-rules.md`.
|
|
|
|
**`extract.mjs` is not duplicated here.** It is the same unmodified script
|
|
committed at `../adrio-extract/extract.mjs`, and a second copy is a second thing
|
|
to keep true — `CLAUDE.md`'s single-source rule applied to a tool rather than to
|
|
a fact. If you change it, both reference documents' counts have to be re-run.
|
|
|
|
## The one command that reproduces Finding 1
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
for f in *.txt; do
|
|
printf '%-40s %s\n' "$f" "$(grep -o -F 'Model Mediation Rules' "$f" | wc -l)"
|
|
done
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Expect `0` on all four. `grep -o -F 'National Mediation Rules'` returns 10 on
|
|
`rules-codes__national-mediation-rules.txt`.
|