Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
79b19a7bd0
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 5s
Step 5 ships /practice/ and the six practice-area pages (construction,
technology, energy, insurance, shareholder, cross-border) from one route, and
adds the mechanical §4 gate Pouya ruled for.
check:claims — §4 Forbidden becomes a build error
scripts/check-claims.mjs greps dist/**/*.html for 10 patterns, each carrying
the incident that put it there. It strips <style> and non-JSON-LD <script>
first (a bare sweep for "leading" returned 26 hits, 25 of them
var(--leading-body)), self-tests every pattern against fixtures before
sweeping, and refuses a missing, empty or stale dist/. Wired into /build
Phase 5 and both deploy paths.
Q54 — six conduct undertakings publish, and §4 gains a third class
Conduct undertakings sit apart from credentials and offerings: the gate is
that Pouya said it in terms. The strings live in CONDUCT_UNDERTAKINGS so a
softening is one visible diff. (e) and (f) replace the third-person sentences
already on /arbitration/ rather than joining them.
Q49, Q50 recorded as rulings. §7 records the SES us-east-1 stray identity's
deletion. R11 holds typescript at its current major, with the peer-range
reason recorded.
Three facts corrected, two of them already shipped
- The LAT gloss said mediation "before filing and continuing after filing";
the Tribunal names mediation for "Before you apply" only and its second
sentence is about negotiation. An ellipsis in docs/01 had deleted it.
- "Connection allocation" is not an Ontario term.
- "The 2026 privacy statute" does not exist — Bill C-27 died without royal
assent. Struck from docs/03 rather than corrected in place.
ADR Chambers struck from /arbitration/ and from docs/01 item 3 (Pouya,
2026-08-30): the source establishes what the firm publishes, not that an
outside neutral can be appointed under its rules.
claims-auditor gains a second lens — for every quoted source, whether the
sentence beneath stays inside what the quotation establishes. Four shipped
defects had that shape and none of them is greppable.
CLAUDE.md gains a convention: never truncate the output of a check you intend
to believe. `npm run check | tail -3` returns warnings, hints and a blank line
and drops the errors line; it was reported as passing four times while
astro check was exiting 1 with 10 type errors.
Gates, exit status read directly, not through a pipe:
npm run check exit=0
npm run lint exit=0
npm run build exit=0
npm run check:claims exit=0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
184 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
184 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
# ADRIC rules and codes — the published rule sets, in ADRIC's own words
|
||
|
||
**Why this file exists.** `docs/01-architecture.md` directs `/mediation/` to
|
||
name *"ADRIC Model Mediation Rules"* and `/arbitration/` to name *"ADRIC, ADR
|
||
Chambers, ad hoc"*. A rule set's **name** is a fact about a published document,
|
||
so under Q46(b)'s standard it may be published — but only from a source, not
|
||
from recall. R14: a claim whose artefact is unreachable is unverifiable by
|
||
construction. This is the same fetch-before-writing that caught
|
||
`Chartered Mediator-Arbitrator` (`docs/reference/adrio-designations.md`).
|
||
|
||
**It caught one immediately. See Finding 1.**
|
||
|
||
## Provenance
|
||
|
||
| | |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Retrieved | **2026-08-28** |
|
||
| Method | `curl -sSL` — redirects followed, exit status read, stderr not suppressed |
|
||
| Text extracts | `docs/reference/adric-extract/`, produced by the committed `adrio-extract/extract.mjs` (same script, unmodified) |
|
||
|
||
| URL | HTTP | bytes | text | sha256 |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `https://adric.ca/rules-codes/` | 200 | 120908 | 4579 | `e7281b28e3d739f8d91985d5094fbdff7dea24e3a360d00ec32e387e32e9a1c9` |
|
||
| `https://adric.ca/rules-codes/national-mediation-rules/` | 200 | 110894 | 6130 | `c55fe482da8aa7a69377703b9192bda0d926f012e45a90ca5ce5d27a7b0344ac` |
|
||
| `https://adric.ca/rules-codes/arbrules/` | 200 | 122211 | 11004 | `07b9850f41bbf40f6ce3a3778876853091ac25a6bb255ef0c4b2827af69a937e` |
|
||
| `https://adric.ca/rules-codes/adric-med-arb-rules/` | 200 | 114700 | 8445 | `153479af8235022170b31c9673262f4e10a51e9f99fcffcb3e0c7dd23d037393` |
|
||
|
||
⚠️ **THE HTML DIGESTS DRIFT ON EVERY REQUEST. THE TEXT EXTRACTS DO NOT.**
|
||
Unlike the ADRIO fetch, where the digests were stable and are therefore stamped
|
||
as the artefact, these pages change per response. **Measured, not assumed** — the
|
||
mediation-rules page was fetched twice, three minutes apart:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
first : c55fe482da8aa7a69377703b9192bda0d926f012e45a90ca5ce5d27a7b0344ac
|
||
second: e9f74014ec04e8fcab0f1cbbd75ef4cb104c8d94992b93c832d41c8259ce78b2
|
||
text identical? YES
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Four causes, read out of the diff rather than guessed at:
|
||
|
||
1. a per-render page-builder class suffix (`highend_6a91df2f53035` →
|
||
`highend_6a91dfca9a8be`);
|
||
2. a **rotating corporate-member logo carousel** in the footer — nine sponsor
|
||
logos, reordered per request;
|
||
3. **Cloudflare email obfuscation**, which re-keys the `email-protection#…`
|
||
hash per response;
|
||
4. a **Cloudflare challenge-platform token** (`__CF$cv$params` `r` and `t`).
|
||
|
||
*(This paragraph first asserted "a WordPress nonce and rotating asset query
|
||
strings" — a guess, written before the second fetch. None of the four causes is
|
||
that. Corrected before commit, and recorded because a guessed cause for an
|
||
observed difference is exactly what `CLAUDE.md` bars.)*
|
||
|
||
**So the stable artefact is `docs/reference/adric-extract/`**, and the term
|
||
counts below were run against those extracts. A digest mismatch on re-fetch is
|
||
**not** evidence the content changed — re-extract and compare the text.
|
||
|
||
Also on the record: `https://adric.ca/rules/` returns **403**, and
|
||
`/mediation-rules/` and `/arbitration-rules/` return **404**. The working paths
|
||
are all under `/rules-codes/`. Recorded because a 403 body is 52 bytes and reads
|
||
like an empty page.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Finding 1 — "ADRIC Model Mediation Rules" is NOT the name of anything
|
||
|
||
`docs/01-architecture.md` §`/mediation/` item 3 directed the page to name the
|
||
**"ADRIC Model Mediation Rules"**. The string does not exist in ADRIC's
|
||
materials.
|
||
|
||
| Term | rules-codes | national-mediation-rules | arbrules | adric-med-arb-rules |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `Model Mediation Rules` | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
||
| `National Mediation Rules` | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 |
|
||
| `ADRIC Mediation Rules` | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
||
| `ADRIC Arbitration Rules` | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
|
||
| `ADRIC Med-Arb Rules` | 5 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
|
||
|
||
**Where "Model" actually belongs.** ADRIC publishes a **Model Dispute Resolution
|
||
Clause** — a contract clause, inside the rules document. The spec's phrase
|
||
conflates the clause's name with the rules' name.
|
||
|
||
**The canonical title, from the page's own heading:** *"The ADRIC National
|
||
Mediation Rules"*. The Model Clause it publishes uses the same form —
|
||
*"shall be mediated pursuant to the **National Mediation Rules** of the ADR
|
||
Institute of Canada, Inc."*
|
||
|
||
**One inconsistency in ADRIC's own materials, recorded so it is not read later
|
||
as our error.** The `/rules-codes/` index has a card labelled *"ADRIC Mediation
|
||
Rules"* (1 occurrence, card link text) while its nav and the document itself say
|
||
*"National Mediation Rules"*. **Use `ADRIC National Mediation Rules`** — the
|
||
document's own title, and the form inside the model clause.
|
||
|
||
## Finding 2 — the three rule sets, with the facts a page may state
|
||
|
||
**ADRIC National Mediation Rules.** *"The National Mediation Rules provide rules
|
||
for initiating mediations, including the appointment of a mediator should the
|
||
parties be unable to come to an agreement."* The document contains: Mediation
|
||
Rules including a Code of Conduct; a Standard Form Agreement to Mediate
|
||
(Schedule B); ADRIC administration fees (Schedule A); and the Model Dispute
|
||
Resolution Clause.
|
||
|
||
⚠️ **Currency caveat, verbatim:** *"As of 2025, the ADRIC Mediation Committee is
|
||
currently reviewing the Mediation Rules… In the meantime, the existing rules
|
||
remain in effect and should continue to be used until any updates are formally
|
||
adopted."* So do not date them, and do not describe them as recently revised.
|
||
|
||
**ADRIC Arbitration Rules.** *"ADRIC has adopted new Arbitration Rules and a new
|
||
Arbitrator Appointment Protocol, effective March 1, 2025."* Published as
|
||
**"ADRIC Arbitration Rules – Effective 2025"**, alongside an **ADRIC Arbitrator
|
||
Appointment Protocol** and named forms: Notice to Arbitrate, Request to
|
||
Administer the Arbitration, Request for the appointment of an arbitrator,
|
||
Application for Urgent Interim Measures, Application to Challenge an Arbitrator,
|
||
Notice of Appeal.
|
||
|
||
**ADRIC Med-Arb Rules.** A discussion draft was presented to the membership at
|
||
ADRIC's Annual Conference in **November 2019**. Two sentences are directly
|
||
useful to `/med-arb/`, both verbatim:
|
||
|
||
> "Med-Arb is not merely the merging of separate mediation and arbitration
|
||
> processes, but a unique process designed to meet the needs of particular
|
||
> disputants. It involves nuances and complexities that can be fine-tuned to the
|
||
> needs of the parties as a customized dispute resolution process, **which
|
||
> requires a high level of practitioner competence to do successfully**."
|
||
|
||
> "The Rules are designed to work in tandem with ADRIC's existing Mediation
|
||
> Rules and Arbitration Rules, integrating seamlessly."
|
||
|
||
**Scope, verbatim:** *"Although the Med-Arb Rules were drafted to assist in
|
||
resolving domestic **commercial** disputes, parties may want to apply them to
|
||
international or non-commercial disputes."* That matches §4's commercial scoping
|
||
without being cited for it — it is ADRIC's statement about its own rules, not
|
||
authority for what this practice offers.
|
||
|
||
ADRIC also publishes a **Med-Arb Foundational Course** (in English) and, per this
|
||
page, *"criteria for a specialized designation: the Chartered Med-Arb"*.
|
||
|
||
## Finding 3 — "Chartered Med-Arbitrator" is corroborated by a second body
|
||
|
||
`Chartered Med-Arbitrator` appears **2 times on every one of the four pages** —
|
||
it is ADRIC's own navigation label, under *Designations & CEE → Professional
|
||
Designations*. So the long form §11 now carries, sourced from **ADRIO**, is
|
||
independently the form **ADRIC** uses in its nav. The body prose on the Med-Arb
|
||
Rules page uses the short *"Chartered Med-Arb"*
|
||
**once** — *"criteria for a specialized designation: the Chartered Med-Arb"*.
|
||
|
||
⚠️ *This read "3 occurrences" for one pass. `grep -o -F 'Chartered Med-Arb'`
|
||
does return 3, but **two of the three are substrings of the nav label
|
||
"Chartered Med-Arbitrator"** counted separately one sentence above. `grep -o
|
||
'Chartered Med-Arb(?!itrator)'` returns 1. That is `CLAUDE.md`'s "a grep that
|
||
matches is not a finding until you read what it matched", committed inside the
|
||
document whose whole purpose is sourced counts. Found by
|
||
`adversarial-reviewer`.* **Neither body writes "Mediator-Arbitrator" anywhere in this
|
||
fetch.**
|
||
|
||
## Finding 4 — what is NOT in this fetch, and must not be inferred from it
|
||
|
||
- **The rules' actual provisions.** Every page above is a *landing page*; the
|
||
rules themselves are PDFs behind download links and were **not** fetched. So
|
||
this file supports naming a rule set and describing what a document contains
|
||
at the level its own landing page describes it. It supports **no statement of
|
||
what any rule requires, permits or provides** — including anything about
|
||
consent mechanics, caucus information, or the switch from mediation to
|
||
arbitration in med-arb. Write those as this practice's own protocol, or not at
|
||
all.
|
||
- **Anything about ADR Chambers.** It is not sourced here, and as of 2026-08-30
|
||
it is named on no page: Pouya struck it from `/arbitration/` and from
|
||
`docs/01` item 3. `docs/07-fees.md` cites it only for *published fee ranges*,
|
||
which is a different claim and is internal.
|
||
- **Legal effect.** Nothing here establishes the enforceability of an award, in
|
||
Ontario or anywhere. §4 bars this repository from concluding a proposition of
|
||
law.
|
||
|
||
## Finding 5 — ADRIC superlatives deliberately NOT lifted
|
||
|
||
Same treatment as `adrio-designations.md` Finding 5. These are ADRIC's marketing
|
||
claims about itself and **must not travel onto this site**, where §4 Forbidden
|
||
bars superlatives:
|
||
|
||
- *"The ADRIC Arbitration Rules have been **the leading choice** for Canadian
|
||
businesses since 2002."*
|
||
- *"integrating **seamlessly**"* — quoted above inside a quotation, and it stays
|
||
inside one.
|