bbe535d15833d3c34246f78dc2789c969be4bd3b
14
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
3c3ba5dc6e |
feat: price med-arb by phase, attest the conflicts undertaking, and answer the first real spam
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Pouya's rulings of 2026-09-03 (the last two D20 findings) and 2026-09-04 (the spam observation and four mitigations), in one change set. D20 finding 10 — med-arb is billed BY PHASE, each phase at the rates already published, so /fees/'s "Every figure is on this page" is true as written rather than narrowed. FEES.medArb is the single source; docs/07 §Med-arb carries the rule INTERIM against R5, and R5 now carries it back, because a derived price moves silently when a rate moves. D20 finding 13 — conduct undertaking (g), attested 2026-09-03, published as his wording verbatim on /legal/privacy/ and /contact/. The clause that raised the finding promised to DISCLOSE a conflicts check's outcome, which the attestation does not cover; it is struck. D20 now partitions 17 fixed / 2 refuted / 1 owed. Spam, 2026-09-04 — recorded in docs/05 §Observed abuse with the date and signature. A second honeypot (a decoy checkbox, own class, `hidden`, a label that tells a human not to tick it) and scoring that LABELS and never rejects: nothing is dropped, nothing new is stored, and only the operator notification changes. Q65 opens the WAF cost call. The timing floor could not be built: there is no timing check and never has been. docs/05 carries it struck, and every mechanism that would give a real per-visitor clock breaks zero-JS, handler-and-form-only, or D1. Q66. configure.mjs gains section 5 — a custom origin request policy forwarding CloudFront-Viewer-Address on /api/*. Written, dry-run against the live distribution, NOT applied. It reads the handler's own header reads and refuses to run if the whitelist omits one. And reading the live account to do it found four AGENTS.md §7 rows saying the intake backend was undeployed, two days after it went live — corrected against get-function-configuration, get-routes, get-stage, get-policy and the deployed zip, which was downloaded and read. Review: adversarial-reviewer only (claims-auditor is D20's cutover pass and has run). Round 1 five lenses, 56 findings, 7 blocking, 4 refuted by an independent refuter; round 2 four lenses, 36 findings, 33 of them defects in round 1's own repairs. Stopped at two per D19. Gates, exit status read for each: check 0 · build 0 (23 pages) · check:claims 0 · check:intake 0 · og:proof 0 · lint 0 · spam-score.test 39/39 with 6/6 mutations killed · router.test 30/30 · minifier grep 1 (clean) · lighthouse 0, no category below 95 · configure.mjs dry run 0, nothing written. Nothing deployed and nothing applied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5 |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
67847d94fa |
fix: regenerate favicon.ico with a transparent ground; tick Pouya's read-through
public/favicon.ico shipped with no transparency: all three frames declared a 32-bit alpha channel and then carried alpha=255 on every one of their 256/1024/ 2304 pixels, ground opaque cream rgba(250,247,242,255). Pouya's read-through finding, confirmed by parsing the ICO container directly. The render source carries true alpha (2,272,386 transparent px, 20,795 partial), so this is an export, not a mask derived from the cream ground — R13's harder branch did not fire and R13 is unchanged on its own terms. New scripts/icons.mjs + npm run icons re-derives the icon from the committed master: asserts the source is still the documented crop (R14), verifies a candidate file and renames on success so a rejected build cannot replace a good favicon, and runs a boundary-colour halo test. Composition is unchanged — ink bbox and pixel count identical at all three sizes. apple-touch-icon.png is byte-identical and stays opaque cream deliberately; the reason lives in docs/reference/brand-assets.md §The icon set, with the bar and a pointer in BaseLayout.astro, docs/06 and R13. docs/06: the read-through is ticked, and the cutover callout drops to ONE blocker — Q60's waiting period. Two adversarial review rounds, 15 findings, all resolved, none declined; stopped at two per D19. claims-auditor correctly deferred to cutover per D20. Gates on the committed bytes, exit status read: check 0, build 0 (23 pages), check:claims 0, check:intake 0, og:proof 0, lint 0, lighthouse 0 (worst of 23 99/100/100/100). Nothing deployed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5 |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
4735989f0b |
feat: cut /legal/privacy/ §Who can see it to four plain statements; name SML Company Ltd on the consent; close Q64 moot
Two rulings from Pouya, 2026-09-02.
(1) The section stays generic — "it over-explains technical mechanics that
belong in the evidence file, not in front of an inquirer." Deleted: the
measurement paragraph, the root-credential sentence, the SSO/federated-login
enumeration, the resource-policy clause, the "company that runs a database"
aside, the deploy-credential sentence and the three-copies summary. All of it
stays true and stays measured in AGENTS.md §7 and the evidence file, which now
maps each shipped sentence to what it rests on.
(2) The consent string names the corporation: "I consent to SML Company Ltd
storing and using the information in this form…". docs/05 §Consent text moves
with it, proven byte-identical. Two new §4 rows carry the attestations the copy
rests on.
(3) The §Who can see it approval closes via the page read-through, which is now
blocker 2 in docs/06's callout rather than a checklist line.
Q64 closes MOOT — the paragraph it was about was deleted, so it gates nothing.
The underlying gap is unchanged: §7 records root as held by Pouya, not held only
by Pouya, and nothing about root custody may be published without asking again.
Two sentences were added back under review: the shared-account disclosure, to
§Where it is stored (a storage disclosure, never named in the ruling — without
it no page said the intake sits in a shared account), and one naming SML Company
Ltd in the policy, because a consent naming a company the linked policy never
mentions is an accountability gap.
adversarial-reviewer, two rounds, 14 findings, all resolved, none declined;
nine of round 2's ten were defects in round 1's own repairs. claims-auditor
correctly deferred to cutover per D20.
Gates, exit status read: check 0 · build 0 (23 pages) · check:claims 0
(12 patterns, 33 approved strings) · check:intake 0 · og:proof 0 · lint 0 ·
lighthouse 0, worst of 23 99/100/100/100. Tripwire proven both ways — exit 0 on
the revised page, exit 1 with 5 matches on the
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
99889a3491 |
feat: rule Q63 in three limbs; take the human headcount off /legal/privacy/; close R10; ratify /med-arb/
Pouya's rulings, 2026-09-02.
Q63(a) — wording approved with two trims: the editorial closing sentence is
struck, and the mailbox clause is rewritten per (b).
Q63(b) — info@smlcompany.ca is a delegated mailbox read by Pouya and by
administrative staff. The page said "anyone who can reach that mailbox"; it now
says who. The answer reached four sentences, not the one the ruling named, in
three sections: "my mailbox" had been written as a personal one throughout.
Q63(c) — the account root credential is held by Pouya, has no programmatic key
and carries MFA. The page now states the first two.
And the answer to (c) took the human headcount off the page. His attestation:
"two people is an exaggeration... a handful is accurate — the simulation counts
identities, not humans, and the two are not the same claim." The enumeration was
exhaustive and the inference off it was not: two IAM identities is a LOWER BOUND
on people and was published as an exact count. The page now attributes read
access to "the account's administrators — me, and the small number of people who
administer it with me", and the false inference is corrected at its source in
docs/reference/intake-table-access-verification.md as well as on the page.
R10 — CLOSED on a fresh one-line confirmation, not on the 2026-08-28 stamp.
ADRIC, ADRIO, the three OBA sections and the CTF all current. Re-stamped on all
four stamp-bearing sites; the row stays live, because its trigger is an event.
/med-arb/ — ratified as shipped, no credential line restored. His note for the
record: med-arb is a service he provides, not a designation.
The tripwire is unchanged and proven both ways: exit 0 on the revised page,
exit 1 with 5 matches on the pre-correction bytes rebuilt from
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
6aaf089b05 |
feat: rule Q62 by stating the truth; strike the /med-arb/ gloss; re-stamp R18
Pouya's four rulings of 2026-09-01, applied 2026-09-02.
Q62 — RULED "state the truth", not "remove the access". /legal/privacy/
now says two people can read the intake table, names their role, and adds
the two stronger facts the false sentence had crowded out: the handler
role holds PutItem only, and adr-sml-deploy is implicitDeny on all seven
read and write actions. Wording is subject to Pouya's read-through —
Q63(a), with a TODO(pouya) beside the copy.
The ruling named one sentence; a vocabulary sweep found the falsehood in
three places, and the audit then found two more. Five paragraphs now
answer "who can see it" and change together.
The tripwire stays permanently, per ruling, and grew from two
alternatives to five. Every alternative is one string that reached dist/.
Proven both ways against the pre-correction page rebuilt from
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
bd282aa47d |
feat: production run — Q61 ramp, /404/, CloudFront router, cutover runbook
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Five items of Pouya's production run, 2026-09-01.
Q61 — scroll-padding-top becomes a max() ramp on `10lh - 83px`, with the
plain calc() first as the fallback for engines without `lh`. Hidden focus
stops under minimumFontSize=32: 290 of 1,455 -> 0, control build still
290. Default settings byte-identical (0 differences over 352 page-widths x
17 fields). The 12 residual cells at minimumFontSize=16/20 are pre-existing
and unchanged-or-better; reported, not widened, per instruction.
Intake backend + CloudFront — docs/09-cutover-runbook.md is the
copy-paste sequence for admin execution: every command followed by its
verification and expected output, rollback per part, and Part 10 is Q60's
TTL test. infra/cloudfront/router.js is the trailing-slash function
(30-case suite; 8 fail against the pre-review version, incl. a
protocol-relative open redirect). infra/cloudfront/configure.mjs is
dry-run-by-default and idempotent. scripts/intake-env.mjs emits the six
Lambda env vars from src/data/site.ts.
Four launch blockers found by reading the running system:
- handler.mjs wrote pk/sk; the live table's key is submissionId with no
sort key, so every submission would have failed validation silently
- the Lambda invoke permission is scoped to the old route path
- 22 of 23 pages 403 without the router function
- there was no 404 page; src/pages/404.astro adds it
Claims audit (D20 cutover pass) — five gloss over-reaches corrected on
/practice/energy/, /practice/insurance/ (x2), /practice/technology/ and
/med-arb/. Three findings left open for Pouya: Q62, the /med-arb/ gloss,
and Q60.
Q62 — one frozen-tripwire pattern added under the freeze's own breach
exception, with a probe and four negative fixtures. check:claims exits 1
until the false /legal/privacy/ sentence is corrected, so both deploy
paths are blocked by a mechanism rather than by memory.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
9f2d2eeb04 |
fix: resolve adversarial review round 2 — 9 findings, 8 of them in round 1's fixes
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
D19 caps the loop at two rounds, and this is what the second round is for. BLOCKING. Round 1 made NO_RETAINER_NOTICE a requireEnv and added it to no document, while the fix's own comment claimed docs/06 named it. The deployment list said five variables for a handler that needs six, so an operator following the cutover checklist would have deployed a function that throws at cold start on every invocation — 5xx from API Gateway, every inquiry lost from the moment /api/* was wired, loud in CloudWatch and silent to Pouya. docs/05 and docs/06 now name all six, and the comment that asserted the documentation existed is corrected rather than deleted. The intake route check added in round 1 could not fail: curl -w already prints 000 on a failed transfer, so `|| echo 000` double-appended and the failure arm was unreachable, and the pass arm accepted anything that was not literally 404 — including the 403 CloudFront returns when the /api/* behaviour is missing, which is the one distinction the check exists to draw. It now sends the correct Origin and asserts a positive: 303 to /contact/could-not-send/, which the handler returns before any DynamoDB write or email. Probed on refused/501/403/303; the old version passed the first three. Fixed in both deploy paths. Removing priceRange left three statements saying it was present or pending, one of them the stated reason /fees/ emits no Offer node. Deleting overtimeStartsAfterSessionHours left AGENTS.md §9 naming it and left Q59 recorded as open. The Google-as-processor fix was applied to the privacy policy's "Where it is stored" and not to "Who can see it", which still read "Nobody else has access". And the variable removal was justified with a path-scoped git grep — which also cannot see untracked files. The unscoped sweep found docs/06's variable table, the OIDC example, and .env.example still carrying them; .env.example also restates the execute-api hostname, falsifying a live claim in intake.ts that has been corrected. That file is not edited here: this environment denies read access to it, and nothing may edit a file it cannot read. It is in the batched list. Also: og:image:alt was the page title rather than the card's headline on 20 pages; og-card.ts documented the wrong path and invocation for the contact sheet; deploy-local.sh still said Q22's deploy credential "does NOT yet exist"; and the round-1 fix comments were trimmed per D19, though the ratio held at 0.44. Round 2 also confirmed the round-1 fixes by measurement: all 56 .btn instances across 22 pages, the consent checkbox's computed accessible name, the radio labels hit-tested at 44px, and og:proof exercised against synthetic article pages in a sandbox. Verified: check/build/check:claims/og:proof/check:intake/lint/bio:pdf all exit 0 on a clean build; 22 pages; Lighthouse 99-100 / 100 / 100 / 100, CLS 0.000. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5 |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
210bc25a26 |
feat: build steps 7a-10 — the site is complete and reviewable at 22 pages
Steps 7a through 10 as one authorised run. Nothing deployed (D11).
7a Lighthouse returns as `lighthouse@13.4.1` + `chrome-launcher`, NOT
`@lhci/cli`. AGENTS.md §7's advisory attribution was wrong: the carriers
were @lhci/cli's own `tmp` and @puppeteer/browsers' `extract-zip`, not
Lighthouse, which audits clean. A deliberate deviation from R11's literal
trigger, recorded with what it costs. Local gate; CI has no Chrome.
7b OG card generator (satori + sharp) discharges R15 — 20 typed cards plus
per-article cards; the portrait stays on / and /about/ by Q40. Insights
plumbing: ArticleCard, Prose, the index, the article route, articleGraph,
and /'s section 7. Card copy is constrained structurally because text in a
JPEG cannot be grepped by check:claims: every headline IS its page's <h1>,
enforced by `npm run og:proof`.
7c Five drafted launch articles, draft: true / reviewedByPouya: false. An
independent compliance audit returned 76 findings and 57 unsourced
assertions; all blocking and should-fix applied.
8 /contact/, the intake form, and backend/intake/ (undeployed). Plain HTML
POST to a same-origin /api/intake with a 303 redirect, so the form works
with zero JavaScript. docs/05 records three deliberate deviations.
9 /fees/ on Q59's ruling — overtime runs from the session cap, and the
reservation point ships adjacent to the rate. One-page PDF bio discharges
R16; /bio/ is its source, so the circulated artefact stays inside the
review apparatus.
10 /legal/privacy/ and /legal/terms/, written to the backend as built. Three
of the policy's statements are derived and cannot drift.
Also: /about/'s inverse credentials band (approved at step 6); Q59 closed;
R15 and R16 discharged; and a fix to shipped copy — /practice/energy/ asserted
the absence of a regulation the source extract says must not be asserted.
Review: adversarial-reviewer, two rounds (D20/D19). Round 1 returned 16
findings including two blocking — an invisible ghost button on /fees/ at
1.00:1 that Lighthouse scored 100, and a privacy policy that named one data
processor when there are two. All 16 acted on.
Lighthouse, 22 pages, mobile: performance 99-100, accessibility 100,
best practices 100, SEO 100 on every indexable page, CLS 0.000.
AGENTS.md entry (ah) has the detail, including four of my own verification
commands that were wrong and what each of them nearly caused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
610edc24fd |
feat: Q.Arb is held; strike C.Med-Arb entirely; dissolve the paired disclosure
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 4s
Pouya's ruling, 2026-08-29. Treated as D3-class and swept accordingly. §4 Q.Arb becomes a HELD designation. Obtained July 2026 — recorded in the register, deliberately not published. Public copy carries "Q.Arb (ADRIC / ADRIO)" beside Q.Med and nothing more. Every stage form is struck: "commenced", "in progress", "pathway", "not yet". C.Med-Arb as a stated goal is struck. This DEVIATES FROM THE STRATEGY BRIEF, which made it "the explicit long-term professional narrative"; the brief is not in this repository, so the deviation is recorded in four places so nobody reinstates it from a document no reader can open. The designation stays in §11 as a definition — what is struck is its status as a goal of his. The paired-disclosure condition dissolves. It existed only because Q.Arb was in progress; there is no stage left to disclose, and a condition with no subject cannot be half-kept. Pages /about/'s credentialing arc is DELETED, not rewritten — two held designations are not a journey. /arbitration/ loses its stage section and its "Available now, and open about the stage" h1. /med-arb/'s endpoint section is rewritten. Deleting CREDENTIALS.goal/goalName rather than emptying them turned every consumer into a build error, which is how the last two surfaced. hasCredential now maps CREDENTIALS.designations instead of indexing [0]; _DesignationRowParity pins the visible credential row to the same constant. check:claims q-arb-as-a-stage (inverted from the predecessor, which barred Q.Arb reading as HELD) and c-med-arb-struck. Each page is now scanned twice — as published, and with inline tags collapsed — because [^<] cannot cross <strong>, which this site sets in prose. Two open questions for Pouya, neither blocking: Q55 — the acquisition date. §4 says obtained July 2026; the Change Log of 2026-08-26 records "commenced August 2026", both stamped [verified — Pouya]. They cannot both be true. Nothing published turns on it. Q56 — is the mediation offering scoped commercial? §4 leaves it unscoped; four surfaces say "commercial mediation"; /practice/insurance/ offers mediation in insured-versus-insurer SABS matters. Two review rounds, all findings applied or declined with a stated reason. Round 2 found ten lines in docs/03 still instructing the struck form — the 2026-08-29 sweep missed them because `git grep 'Q.Arb'` is line-anchored and the block never names it. Sweep the vocabulary, not only the subject. Gates, exit statuses read directly, never through a pipe: npm run check exit=0 (0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 hints) npm run lint exit=0 npm run build exit=0 (12 pages) npm run check:claims exit=0 (11 patterns, 26 approved strings) npm audit exit=0 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5 |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
79b19a7bd0 |
feat: build step 5 — /practice/ and six area pages; check:claims gates §4 in dist
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 5s
Step 5 ships /practice/ and the six practice-area pages (construction,
technology, energy, insurance, shareholder, cross-border) from one route, and
adds the mechanical §4 gate Pouya ruled for.
check:claims — §4 Forbidden becomes a build error
scripts/check-claims.mjs greps dist/**/*.html for 10 patterns, each carrying
the incident that put it there. It strips <style> and non-JSON-LD <script>
first (a bare sweep for "leading" returned 26 hits, 25 of them
var(--leading-body)), self-tests every pattern against fixtures before
sweeping, and refuses a missing, empty or stale dist/. Wired into /build
Phase 5 and both deploy paths.
Q54 — six conduct undertakings publish, and §4 gains a third class
Conduct undertakings sit apart from credentials and offerings: the gate is
that Pouya said it in terms. The strings live in CONDUCT_UNDERTAKINGS so a
softening is one visible diff. (e) and (f) replace the third-person sentences
already on /arbitration/ rather than joining them.
Q49, Q50 recorded as rulings. §7 records the SES us-east-1 stray identity's
deletion. R11 holds typescript at its current major, with the peer-range
reason recorded.
Three facts corrected, two of them already shipped
- The LAT gloss said mediation "before filing and continuing after filing";
the Tribunal names mediation for "Before you apply" only and its second
sentence is about negotiation. An ellipsis in docs/01 had deleted it.
- "Connection allocation" is not an Ontario term.
- "The 2026 privacy statute" does not exist — Bill C-27 died without royal
assent. Struck from docs/03 rather than corrected in place.
ADR Chambers struck from /arbitration/ and from docs/01 item 3 (Pouya,
2026-08-30): the source establishes what the firm publishes, not that an
outside neutral can be appointed under its rules.
claims-auditor gains a second lens — for every quoted source, whether the
sentence beneath stays inside what the quotation establishes. Four shipped
defects had that shape and none of them is greppable.
CLAUDE.md gains a convention: never truncate the output of a check you intend
to believe. `npm run check | tail -3` returns warnings, hints and a blank line
and drops the errors line; it was reported as passing four times while
astro check was exiting 1 with 10 type errors.
Gates, exit status read directly, not through a pipe:
npm run check exit=0
npm run lint exit=0
npm run build exit=0
npm run check:claims exit=0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Md3GndFqWPzK78xAoebsg5
|
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
7514a49803 |
feat: upgrade to Astro 7; harden the content schema; wire a11y linting
Amends D1 to pin the major explicitly (v7.x) rather than inherit it. The ^5.0.0 pin was recalled rather than checked and was two majors stale the day it was written, which meant shipping a framework carrying high-severity XSS advisories. CLAUDE.md now requires every version pin to be verified against the registry, and R11 requires re-checking at each build-order boundary. npm audit now reports 0 vulnerabilities, down from 16. Every Astro advisory is cleared; the residual 10 all traced to @lhci/cli, which is removed — it was the sole source of 7 high-severity findings, 0.15.1 is latest so there was no clean upgrade, and it cannot run without pages or a lighthouserc. Re-added at build step 7 with a freshly verified pin. Content collections migrated to the Content Layer API: src/content.config.ts, loader: glob(), z from astro/zod. Two review passes found seven defects in the fix itself, all now closed: - z.coerce.date() read an unquoted 20260801 as epoch milliseconds and yielded 1970-01-01 silently; the first replacement then accepted 2026-13-45 as an Invalid Date and rolled 2026-02-30 over to 2026-03-02. Dates are now anchored, date-only, parsed as UTC and round-tripped. - The title bound applied the SEO spec's 50-60 to the headline rather than the rendered <title>, which guaranteed 68-78 on every article and rejected all five planned launch headlines. Articles are now the documented exception: the headline is the <title>, no suffix. - An article could ship an image with no alt text, or whitespace-only alt. - Two schema comments asserted controls nothing enforced; both are now real refinements, each tested with a failing and a passing case. - PRACTICE_SLUGS and PRACTICE_AREAS could drift silently; a compile-time check now catches both directions. - eslint.config.js imported globals and @eslint/js undeclared, resolving by hoisting accident. - scripts/deploy-local.sh claimed parity with CI while skipping npm run check and two credential guards — on the only path this site can ship today. Accessibility linting is on (36 jsx-a11y rules) before step 1 writes the layout. An earlier claim in §7 that none was possible was wrong twice, and is corrected in AGENTS.md entry (t) along with the reasoning. Opens Q30 and Q31 for two unregistered claims in src/data/site.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
0d8b63380a |
chore: install toolchain, wire lint, add local deploy path
Answers four questions and starts build step 1. Q22 — the scoped deploy user does not exist: aws iam get-user returns NoSuchEntity. Recorded in §7 as NOT PROVISIONED and swept so that no file describes it as existing. §10 records that user/pouya, the broadly- permissioned personal user that has been authenticating to this account, must never be used in CI; scripts/deploy-local.sh refuses to run as it. Q23 — the Gitea instance reports 1.27.2, well above the vars-context floor, so the first-step guard is belt-and-braces rather than load-bearing. What remains is not a fact but a dependency: the instance is jointly administered, so enabling Actions and registering a runner both need a second admin. Hence npm run deploy (scripts/deploy-local.sh), which performs exactly what the workflow performs — same guard, same three passes, same headers, same invalidation. Documented as the current path, not as a workaround. §10 gains the risk that follows: the deploy secret will live on jointly administered infrastructure, where an instance admin can reach repo secrets. That does not change the plan, but it makes the scoped IAM policy the actual control between a shared Gitea instance and an AWS account holding another business's client-database backups. Never widen it. Q27 — response time is two business days, in site.ts with a derived short form so the confirmation email cannot drift from the page. Q28 — OBA sections confirmed, stamped "for now"; membership renews yearly, tracked as R10. Build step 1: dependencies installed and package-lock.json created, closing the npm ci blocker. ESLint flat config and Prettier config added; npm run lint, check and build all pass. Prettier deliberately excludes *.md and tokens.css — reasons recorded in .prettierignore. npm audit reports 7 high-severity advisories, all requiring an Astro major upgrade. Not applied; escalated in AGENTS.md entry (s) as a decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF |
||
|
Pouya LajevardiandClaude Opus 5
|
6bf1167624 |
fix: sweep D3 amendment through the specs; correct inverted DKIM table
The re-audit of the deploy-guard change surfaced defects well outside the diff, including one that would have broken production mail. docs/05-backend-spec.md had the two SES DKIM sets exactly inverted, labelling the three records that resolve as "orphans" and the three NXDOMAIN records as "Live. Never delete". Entry (j) corrected this in AGENTS.md §7 and the correction never reached docs/05. Since SES has no custom MAIL FROM, DKIM is the only thing satisfying DMARC, so acting on that table would have silently broken intake mail authentication. Also in this change: - .gitea/workflows/deploy.yml gains a guard as steps[0] that fails the run, naming the variable, if AWS_REGION, S3_BUCKET or CLOUDFRONT_DISTRIBUTION_ID is empty — how a Gitea too old for the vars context manifests. Verified fail-closed under bash -e, sh -e and bash -euo pipefail. - AGENTS.md Current Truth: SPF and DMARC recorded as present (Q20), the matching §10 High risk row retired, three duplicate Q rows removed. - docs/reference/AWS-Hosting-Guide.md tracked and given a do-not-execute banner; it was an executable procedure for the architecture D1/D3 replace. - Copy decks: "a working litigator" and "an active litigation practice" replaced with the register's own wording; LegalService JSON-LD replaced with ProfessionalService; tribunal-secretary offers removed per D14; nine stale question blockers swept. - astro.config.mjs: prefetchAll disabled — it injected JS into every page against the zero-JS convention with no decision recorded. - src/data/site.ts: unregistered response-time commitment nulled (Q27); OBA section names downgraded to [assumed] (Q28). - s3:AbortMultipartUpload reasoning corrected to measure ./dist, not the repo. Opens Q27, Q28, Q29. AGENTS.md entry (q) records the full resolution, including the findings declined and why. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012XquaEq4BgWMCwUqLEyNkF |
||
|
Pouya Lajevardi
|
19f7226661 |
chore: project scaffold, specs, and working record
Build and deploy / build-and-deploy (push) Failing after 5s
|